Abstract
Abstract This study examined the effects of foliar spraying with seaweed extract at three levels (0,1,2 ml L -1 ) sequentially, zinc nanoparticles at three levels (0, 10, 20 mg L -1 ), and nano-iron at three levels (0,20,40 mg L -1 ). The randomised complete block design (RCBD) factorial experiment included three levels of seaweed extract, three levels of nano-zinc, three levels of nano-iron, and three repetitions of four seedlings per experimental unit, resulting in 180 observations and 60 treatments per sector. 180 seedlings were randomly assigned treatments. Spraying marine extract at 2 ml L -1 significantly improved seedling height, stem diameter, dry weight, chlorophyll, and leaf area. It outperformed the control in seedling height, stem diameter, dry weight, chlorophyll, and leaf area. The combination of 40 mg L -1 zing and iron nanoparticles improved seedling height, stem diameter, dry weight, chlorophyll, and leaf area compared to the comparator treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying marine extract at 2 ml L -1 significantly improved seedling height, stem diameter and dry weight compared with the control.
- Taxon
- Ziziphus Mauritiana
Ziziphus mauritianat0 - Treatment
- Spraying marine extract at 2 ml L -1e0
- Outcome
- seedling height, stem diameter, dry weighte0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Ziziphus Mauritiana Seedling Growth”
e0“Spraying marine extract at 2 ml L -1 significantly improved seedling height, stem diameter, dry weight, chlorophyll, and leaf area”
e1“It outperformed the control in seedling height, stem diameter, dry weight, chlorophyll, and leaf area”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying marine extract at 2 ml L -1 significantly improved chlorophyll and leaf area compared with the control.
- Taxon
- Ziziphus MauritianaZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- Spraying marine extract at 2 ml L -1e0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll, and leaf areae0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Ziziphus Mauritiana Seedling Growth”
e0“Spraying marine extract at 2 ml L -1 significantly improved seedling height, stem diameter, dry weight, chlorophyll, and leaf area”
e1“It outperformed the control in seedling height, stem diameter, dry weight, chlorophyll, and leaf area”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination of 40 mg L -1 zinc and iron nanoparticles improved seedling height, stem diameter and dry weight compared with the comparator treatment.
- Taxon
- Ziziphus MauritianaZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- 40 mg L -1 zing and iron nanoparticlese2
- Outcome
- seedling height, stem diameter, dry weighte2
- Direction
- improvede2
- Comparator
- comparator treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Ziziphus Mauritiana Seedling Growth”
e2“The combination of 40 mg L -1 zing and iron nanoparticles improved seedling height, stem diameter, dry weight, chlorophyll, and leaf area compared to the comparator treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination of 40 mg L -1 zinc and iron nanoparticles improved chlorophyll and leaf area compared with the comparator treatment.
- Taxon
- Ziziphus MauritianaZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- 40 mg L -1 zing and iron nanoparticlese2
- Outcome
- chlorophyll, and leaf areae2
- Direction
- improvede2
- Comparator
- comparator treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Ziziphus Mauritiana Seedling Growth”
e2“The combination of 40 mg L -1 zing and iron nanoparticles improved seedling height, stem diameter, dry weight, chlorophyll, and leaf area compared to the comparator treatment”
The same questions in other papers
application · growth · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →botanical · growth · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
nanoparticle · growth · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
application · physiology: pigments · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.