Paper · 2023 · Forests

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Adjusts Root Architecture to Promote Leaf Nitrogen Accumulation and Reduce Leaf Carbon–Nitrogen Ratio of Mulberry Seedlings

Huirong Zhang; Hongguang Cheng; Gratien Twagirayezu; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the initial stages of restoring rocky desertification, the proliferation of nutrients strongly influences plant survival. The carbon–nitrogen doctrine in plants argues that a lower leaf carbon–nitrogen (C:N) ratio enhances the growth of plant nutrients. However, the mechanisms by which inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can influence plants during the restoration of rocky desertification are not thoroughly understood. This study used mulberry as a suitable example of a mycorrhizal plant in desertification areas to examine changes in growth, leaf carbon, nitrogen accumulation, and the carbon–nitrogen ratio post inoculation using AMF. The correlation between leaf carbon–nitrogen ratio and root morphology following AMF inoculation was also examined. The results demonstrated that inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri) not only enhanced above-ground growth and improved carbon and nitrogen nutrient absorption but also had a more pronounced effect on leaf nitrogen accumulation than on carbon accumulation, resulting in a potential decrease in the leaf C:N ratio by 42.13%. It also significantly improved root morphology by exponentially increasing the number of connections and crossings by 120.5% and 109.8%, respectively. Further analysis revealed a negative correlation between leaf C:N ratio and root morphology, as well as between root length and the number of connections. Plants with more developed root systems exhibited greater competitiveness for nitrogen, resulting in a lower leaf C:N ratio. This study suggests that the inoculation of AMF could enhance leaf nitrogen accumulation and reduce the leaf C:N ratio by expanding the spatial absorption range of the root through positive changes in root morphology, thereby promoting plant nutrient growth. This study forms a fundamental scientific basis for the successful management of desertification.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Funneliformis mosseae inoculation changed mulberry above-ground growth.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)e0
Interactor
Funneliformis mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
above-ground growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated that inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri) not only enhanced above-ground growth and improved carbon and nitrogen nutrient absorption but also had a more pronounced effect on leaf nitrogen accumulation than on carbon accumulation, resulting in a potential decrease in the leaf C:N ratio by 42.13%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Funneliformis mosseae inoculation changed mulberry carbon and nitrogen nutrient absorption.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)e0
Interactor
Funneliformis mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
carbon and nitrogen nutrient absorptione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated that inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri) not only enhanced above-ground growth and improved carbon and nitrogen nutrient absorption but also had a more pronounced effect on leaf nitrogen accumulation than on carbon accumulation, resulting in a potential decrease in the leaf C:N ratio by 42.13%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Funneliformis mosseae inoculation changed mulberry leaf C:N ratio.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)e0
Interactor
Funneliformis mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
leaf C:N ratioe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
42.13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated that inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri) not only enhanced above-ground growth and improved carbon and nitrogen nutrient absorption but also had a more pronounced effect on leaf nitrogen accumulation than on carbon accumulation, resulting in a potential decrease in the leaf C:N ratio by 42.13%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizophagus intraradices inoculation changed mulberry above-ground growth.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)e0
Interactor
Rhizophagus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
above-ground growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated that inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri) not only enhanced above-ground growth and improved carbon and nitrogen nutrient absorption but also had a more pronounced effect on leaf nitrogen accumulation than on carbon accumulation, resulting in a potential decrease in the leaf C:N ratio by 42.13%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizophagus intraradices inoculation changed mulberry carbon and nitrogen nutrient absorption.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)e0
Interactor
Rhizophagus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
carbon and nitrogen nutrient absorptione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated that inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri) not only enhanced above-ground growth and improved carbon and nitrogen nutrient absorption but also had a more pronounced effect on leaf nitrogen accumulation than on carbon accumulation, resulting in a potential decrease in the leaf C:N ratio by 42.13%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizophagus intraradices inoculation changed mulberry leaf C:N ratio.

Taxon
mulberrye0
Treatment
inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri)e0
Interactor
Rhizophagus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
leaf C:N ratioe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
42.13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated that inoculating mulberry with the dominant strains Funneliformis mosseae (Fm) and Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri) not only enhanced above-ground growth and improved carbon and nitrogen nutrient absorption but also had a more pronounced effect on leaf nitrogen accumulation than on carbon accumulation, resulting in a potential decrease in the leaf C:N ratio by 42.13%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased mulberry root number of connections by 120.5%.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)e1
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
number of connectionse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
120.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Mulberry Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–152 · show in text ↑
e0

“It also significantly improved root morphology by exponentially increasing the number of connections and crossings by 120.5% and 109.8%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1320 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased mulberry root crossings by 109.8%.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)e1
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
crossingse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
109.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Mulberry Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–152 · show in text ↑
e0

“It also significantly improved root morphology by exponentially increasing the number of connections and crossings by 120.5% and 109.8%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1320 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–341 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

leaf C:N ratio was negatively correlated with root morphology.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Organ / stage
root morphologye0
Outcome
leaf C:N ratioe0
Direction
negativee0

Verbatim

t0

“Mulberry Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–152 · show in text ↑
e0

“Further analysis revealed a negative correlation between leaf C:N ratio and root morphology, as well as between root length and the number of connections.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1475 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

root length was negatively correlated with number of connections.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Organ / stage
number of connectionse0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
negativee0

Verbatim

t0

“Mulberry Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–152 · show in text ↑
e0

“Further analysis revealed a negative correlation between leaf C:N ratio and root morphology, as well as between root length and the number of connections.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1475 · show in text ↑

inoculation · nutrient: content · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · growth · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.