Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of irrigation, phosphorus and row spacing on physiological characters of pea (Pisum sativum)

R. P. YADAV. D. V. S. CHAUHAN; H. S. KUSHWAHA

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter seasons of 1984-85 and 1985-86 to study the effect of schedules of irrigation, levels of P,O, along with 2 spacings (25 and 50 cm) on physiological characters of pea (Pisum sativum L. sensu lato). The maximum leaf area.plant was noted with 2 irrigations given at 50 and 70 days after sowing and the highest leaf-area ratio with 1 irrigation at 50 days after sowing during both the years.-Application of P,O, improved the leaf area, leaf-area index and leaf- area ratio over the control, but increase in row width reduced these parameters along with relative grow& rate. Significant reduction in relative growth rate of pea was noted with application of irrigation and P,Or

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at 50 and 70 days after sowing produced the maximum pea leaf area per plant.

Treatment
2 irrigations given at 50 and 70 days after sowinge0
Outcome
leaf area.plante0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum leaf area.plant was noted with 2 irrigations given at 50 and 70 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–341 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (Pisum sativum L. sensu lato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One irrigation at 50 days after sowing produced the highest pea leaf-area ratio in both years.

Treatment
1 irrigation at 50 days after sowinge0
Outcome
leaf-area ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
during both the yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest leaf-area ratio with 1 irrigation at 50 days after sowing during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–437 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (Pisum sativum L. sensu lato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application improved pea leaf area, leaf-area index and leaf-area ratio over the control.

Treatment
Application of P,O,e0
Outcome
leaf area, leaf-area index and leaf- area ratioe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P,O, improved the leaf area, leaf-area index and leaf- area ratio over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–536 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (Pisum sativum L. sensu lato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing row width reduced pea leaf area, leaf-area index and leaf-area ratio.

Treatment
increase in row widthe0
Outcome
leaf area, leaf-area index and leaf- area ratioe1
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in row width reduced these parameters along with relative grow& rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–619 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area, leaf-area index and leaf- area ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–519 · show in text ↑
e2

“pea (Pisum sativum L. sensu lato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing row width reduced pea relative growth rate.

Treatment
increase in row widthe0
Outcome
relative grow& ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in row width reduced these parameters along with relative grow& rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–619 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea (Pisum sativum L. sensu lato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly reduced pea relative growth rate.

Treatment
application of irrigatione0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant reduction in relative growth rate of pea was noted with application of irrigation and P,Or”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of P,Or significantly reduced pea relative growth rate.

Treatment
P,Ore0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant reduction in relative growth rate of pea was noted with application of irrigation and P,Or”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–723 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.