Paper · 2023 · Plant Science Today

Evaluation of zinc application methods and integrated nutrient management on variation in growth, yield and yield contributing factors in wheat

Sreethu S; Gurleen Kaur; Vandna Chhabra

3
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Zinc is an important micro nutrient and plays an important role in improving the crop growth and productivity. Intensive agricultural practices due to rise in population have accelerated the use of chemical fertilizers which resulted in depletion of soil fertility. In this regard, a 2 year field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Farm of Lovely Professional University during rabi season in 2021-2022 and 2022-23 to examine the effect of different zinc application methods and integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and yield contributing factors on wheat. Three types of zinc application methods along with various levels of integrated nutrient management approaches were used for the study. The results revealed that a significant interaction between zinc application methods and integrated nutrient management practices was observed with dry matter accumulation (g/m2), Leaf area index, spikes/m2, spike length (cm), number of grains per spike and grain yield of wheat crop. Maximum improvement in grain yield (5.5 t/ha) was obtained when soil+foliar application of zinc was combined with 75% recommended dose of fertilizer + 2.5 t/ha farm yard manure + Zinc solubilizing bacteria. Additionally, these studies need to be repeated at many locations with various agro-climatic circumstances.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application methods and integrated nutrient management interact significantly for dry matter accumulation, leaf area index and spikes per m2 in wheat.

Treatment
zinc application methods and integrated nutrient management practicese0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation (g/m2), Leaf area index, spikes/m2e1
Setting
Agricultural Research Farm of Lovely Professional Universitye4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“contributing factors in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–143 · show in text ↑
e0

“a significant interaction between zinc application methods and integrated nutrient management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–848 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry matter accumulation (g/m2), Leaf area index, spikes/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–925 · show in text ↑
e4

“a 2 year field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Farm of Lovely Professional University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–385 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application methods and integrated nutrient management interact significantly for spike length, grains per spike and grain yield of wheat.

Treatment
zinc application methods and integrated nutrient management practicese0
Outcome
spike length (cm), number of grains per spike and grain yielde2
Setting
Agricultural Research Farm of Lovely Professional Universitye4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“contributing factors in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–143 · show in text ↑
e0

“a significant interaction between zinc application methods and integrated nutrient management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–848 · show in text ↑
e2

“spike length (cm), number of grains per spike and grain yield of wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1002 · show in text ↑
e4

“a 2 year field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Farm of Lovely Professional University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus foliar zinc combined with 75% recommended fertilizer, 2.5 t/ha farmyard manure and zinc solubilizing bacteria gave the maximum wheat grain yield improvement (5.5 t/ha).

Treatment
soil+foliar application of zinc was combined with 75% recommended dose of fertilizer + 2.5 t/ha farm yard manure + Zinc solubilizing bacteriae3
Interactor
Zinc solubilizing bacteriae3symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
Maximum improvemente3
Value
5.5 t/hae3
Setting
Agricultural Research Farm of Lovely Professional Universitye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“contributing factors in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–143 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum improvement in grain yield (5.5 t/ha) was obtained when soil+foliar application of zinc was combined with 75% recommended dose of fertilizer + 2.5 t/ha farm yard manure + Zinc solubilizing bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1209 · show in text ↑
e4

“a 2 year field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Farm of Lovely Professional University”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–385 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.