Abstract
Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is a major tropical fruit, but a short postharvest life hampers marketing. The objective of this work is to assess the influence of a novel nanocomposite poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA) film and Chitosan (CTS) affect on mango postharvest quality while stored at 20 °C. The results showed that the film coating treatment reduced the decay rate and weight loss of mangoes, maintaining good postharvest quality of mango fruit. The film coating treatment increased the antioxidant capacity of mangoes by inhibiting PPO activity and increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes. ACS, ACO, and ethylene release were all suppressed, as well as the expression of the ethylene receptors genes ETR1, ETR2, and ERS2, thus delaying mango aging. After harvest, the EVA treatment was superior to the CTS treatment in mango preservation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Film coating reduced mango decay rate and weight loss.
- Taxon
- mangoes
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- film coating treatmente0
- Outcome
- decay rate and weight losse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The film coating treatment reduced the decay rate and weight loss of mangoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Film coating increased mango antioxidant capacity.
- Taxon
- mangoesMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- film coating treatmente0
- Outcome
- antioxidant capacitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The film coating treatment increased the antioxidant capacity of mangoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Film coating inhibited PPO activity.
- Taxon
- mangoesMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- film coating treatmente0
- Gene
- PPOe0
- Outcome
- PPO activitye0
- Direction
- inhibitinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The film coating treatment increased the antioxidant capacity of mangoes by inhibiting PPO activity”
Claim · model-written summary
Film coating increased antioxidant enzyme activity.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- film coating treatmente1
- Outcome
- activity of antioxidant enzymese0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes”
e1“The film coating treatment increased the antioxidant capacity of mangoes”
t0“Effect of EVA film and chitosan coating on quality and physicochemical characteristics of mango fruit during postharvest storage”
Claim · model-written summary
ACS, ACO and ethylene release were suppressed.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Gene
- ACS, ACOe0
- Outcome
- ethylene releasee0
- Direction
- suppressede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ACS, ACO, and ethylene release were all suppressed”
t0“mango fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
Expression of ETR1, ETR2 and ERS2 was suppressed.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Gene
- ETR1, ETR2, and ERS2e0
- Outcome
- expressione0
- Direction
- suppressede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“were all suppressed, as well as the expression of the ethylene receptors genes ETR1, ETR2, and ERS2”
t0“mango fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
EVA preserved mango better than CTS after harvest.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- EVA treatmente0
- Outcome
- mango preservatione0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- CTS treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After harvest, the EVA treatment was superior to the CTS treatment in mango preservation”
The same questions in other papers
storage · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →storage · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →storage · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.