Abstract
The Moroccan red fruit sector has undergone remarkable development over the last decade, driven by the increase in demand from international markets and promoted by the national agricultural strategy. However, this development calls for the sustainability of water resources, especially in the current context of climate change which makes the future availability of water uncertain. In this sense, deficit irrigation (DI) is one of the promising techniques to improve the efficiency of crop water use. Strawberry is one of the most sensitive red fruits to water deficit. Sufficient and correct irrigation is critical to successful production. Therefore, growers often bring in quantities that exceed the needs of the crop, especially in areas where the cost of water is relatively negligible. In this paper, we studied the response of the two strawberry varieties (Sabrina, Victory) to four water treatments ranging from 50% to 125% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc). The two varieties differed significantly in yield and water consumption, with significant reductions in yield under DI treatments (50%ETc) for Sabrina. However, the fully irrigated treatment (100% ETc), and the DI treatments (75% and 50% ETc) did not show significant differences in yield for Victory.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Sabrina and Victory differed significantly in yield.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Material
- Sabrina, Victorye1
- Outcome
- yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The two varieties differed significantly in yield and water consumption”
e1“two strawberry varieties (Sabrina, Victory)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sabrina and Victory differed significantly in water consumption.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Material
- Sabrina, Victorye1
- Outcome
- water consumptione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The two varieties differed significantly in yield and water consumption”
e1“two strawberry varieties (Sabrina, Victory)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 50%ETc, deficit irrigation significantly reduced Sabrina yield.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Material
- Sabrinae0
- Treatment
- DI treatments (50%ETc)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- reductionse0
- Comparator
- fully irrigated treatment (100% ETc)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“significant reductions in yield under DI treatments (50%ETc) for Sabrina”
e1“two strawberry varieties (Sabrina, Victory)”
e2“fully irrigated treatment (100% ETc)”
Claim · model-written summary
Victory yield showed no significant difference between full irrigation and 75% and 50% ETc deficit irrigation.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassae1 - Material
- Victorye0
- Treatment
- DI treatments (75% and 50% ETc)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- did not show significant differencese0
- Comparator
- fully irrigated treatment (100% ETc)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the fully irrigated treatment (100% ETc), and the DI treatments (75% and 50% ETc) did not show significant differences in yield for Victory”
e1“two strawberry varieties (Sabrina, Victory)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.