Abstract
Experiment on the effectiveness of various farming strategies were used to control S. frugiperda in maize during Kharif 2021 and Rabi 2022 at the Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri. The experiment results showed that the standard check chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 0.4 ml/l recorded the lowest larval population (0.85 larvae/plant) and leaf damage score (2.57). Neem seed powder at 2 g/whorl was most effective and significantly superior to the rest of farmer practices, with the larval population of 0.91 larvae/plant. The next effective treatments were lime @ 5 g/whorl, soil @ 5 g/whorl and sand @ 5 g/whorl in reducing larval population and leaf damage infesting S. frugiperda. The highest grain yield (64.01 q/ha) was registered by chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC followed by neem seed powder @ 2 g/whorl ((56.33 q/ha) and lime @ 5 g/whorl (47.40 q p/ha). The highest ICBR (1:3.66) was registered by chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC followed by wood ash (1:1.85).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole had the lowest larval population, 0.85 larvae per plant.
- Treatment
- chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 0.4 ml/le0
- Interactor
- Spodoptera frugiperda
.jpg?width=60)
Spodoptera frugiperdat1pest - Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 0.85 larvae/plante0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“standard check chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 0.4 ml/l recorded the lowest larval population (0.85 larvae/plant)”
t0“maize”
t1“Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) in maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole had the lowest leaf damage score, 2.57.
- Treatment
- chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 0.4 ml/lt1
- Outcome
- leaf damage scoree0
- Direction
- lowestt1
- Value
- 2.57e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“leaf damage score (2.57)”
t0“maize”
t1“standard check chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 0.4 ml/l recorded the lowest larval population (0.85 larvae/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem seed powder was superior to other farmer practices for larval population, at 0.91 larvae per plant.
- Treatment
- Neem seed powder at 2 g/whorle0
- Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Value
- 0.91 larvae/plante0
- Comparator
- the rest of farmer practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neem seed powder at 2 g/whorl was most effective and significantly superior to the rest of farmer practices, with the larval population of 0.91 larvae/plant”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Lime reduced larval population and leaf damage.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lime @ 5 g/whorl, soil @ 5 g/whorl and sand @ 5 g/whorl in reducing larval population and leaf damage”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil reduced larval population and leaf damage.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lime @ 5 g/whorl, soil @ 5 g/whorl and sand @ 5 g/whorl in reducing larval population and leaf damage”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Sand reduced larval population and leaf damage.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lime @ 5 g/whorl, soil @ 5 g/whorl and sand @ 5 g/whorl in reducing larval population and leaf damage”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole gave the highest grain yield at 64.01 q/ha.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest grain yield (64.01 q/ha) was registered by chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem seed powder gave grain yield of 56.33 q/ha.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“neem seed powder @ 2 g/whorl ((56.33 q/ha)”
t0“maize”
t1“highest grain yield (64.01 q/ha) was registered by chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC”
Claim · model-written summary
Lime gave grain yield of 47.40 q p/ha.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lime @ 5 g/whorl (47.40 q p/ha)”
t0“maize”
t1“highest grain yield (64.01 q/ha) was registered by chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole had the highest ICBR at 1:3.66.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest ICBR (1:3.66) was registered by chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Wood ash had ICBR of 1:1.85.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wood ash (1:1.85)”
t0“maize”
t1“highest ICBR (1:3.66) was registered by chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC”
The same questions in other papers
chlorantraniliprole · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →chlorantraniliprole · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →Azadirachta indica · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Azadirachta indica · pest · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →chlorantraniliprole · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
19 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →botanical · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
121 papers more in this group
See all 125 papers →lime · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →growing medium · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.