Paper · 2024 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Ameriolations with VAM and PSB Inoculation of Growth and yield attributes in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Arkel

Siddharth Shankar Bhatt; Maragani Vamshi; Vishwajeet Singh; et al.

9
claims
32
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Pea (Pisum sativum L.) is one of the most important legume grown all over the world with its varied uses as vegetables and other processed products. Its production and productivity in recent times have witnessed a diminishing graph due to numerous biotic and abiotic stresses. With unexploited use of synthetics in legume crops number of nodule formation have reduced to lowest levels. VAM (Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhiza) and PSB (Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria) inoculation in soil have been observed in enhancing number of nodules, levels of NPK uptake and yield in pea. Methods: Considering the importance of above facts and experiment was laid in 2022 with RBD with three replications containing 7 treatments viz. T1 (Control), T2 (75% RDF + 25% PSB), T3 (50% RDF + 50% PSB), T4 (75% RDF + 25% VAM), T5 (50% RDF + 50% VAM), T6 (75% RDF + 12.5% VAM + 12.5% PSB) and T7 (50% RDF + 25% VAM + 25% PSB). Result: Investigations indicated that the treatment T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB) showed significantly high growth, yield and quality like plant height (113.90 cm), number of leaves (87.09), number of branches (20.2), number of nodules (90.56), numbers of pod/plant (19.1), pod length (8.97 cm), number of seeds per pod (8.23), green pod yield/plot (4.80 kg), green pod yield/ha (80.12 q) compared to control. Hence, T7 (50% RDF + 25% VAM + 25% PSB) evidently exhibited a conglomeration of bio nutrient uptake enhancers resulting in maximum yield and quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased pea plant height to 113.90 cm versus control.

Taxon
Pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceuse2
Treatment
T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB)e0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highe0
Value
113.90 cme0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB) showed significantly high growth, yield and quality like plant height (113.90 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1085 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1331 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased the number of leaves to 87.09 versus control.

Taxon
Pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceuse2
Treatment
T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB)e0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
highe0
Value
87.09e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB) showed significantly high growth, yield and quality like plant height (113.90 cm), number of leaves (87.09)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1111 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1331 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased the number of branches to 20.2 versus control.

Taxon
Pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceuse2
Treatment
T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB)e0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
highe0
Value
20.2e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB) showed significantly high growth, yield and quality like plant height (113.90 cm), number of leaves (87.09), number of branches (20.2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1331 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased nodule number to 90.56 versus control.

Taxon
Pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceuse2
Treatment
T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB)e0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
highe0
Value
90.56e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB) showed significantly high growth, yield and quality like plant height (113.90 cm), number of leaves (87.09), number of branches (20.2), number of nodules (90.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1331 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased pods per plant to 19.1 versus control.

Taxon
Pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceuse3
Treatment
T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB)e1
Interactor
VAMe1symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
numbers of pod/plante0
Direction
highe1
Value
19.1e0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“numbers of pod/plant (19.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1194 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB) showed significantly high growth, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1055 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1331 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased pod length to 8.97 cm versus control.

Taxon
Pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceuse3
Treatment
T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB)e1
Interactor
VAMe1symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
pod lengthe0
Direction
highe1
Value
8.97 cme0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod length (8.97 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1216 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB) showed significantly high growth, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1055 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1331 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased seeds per pod to 8.23 versus control.

Taxon
Pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceuse3
Treatment
T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB)e1
Interactor
VAMe1symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
number of seeds per pode0
Direction
highe1
Value
8.23e0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of seeds per pod (8.23)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1248 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB) showed significantly high growth, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1055 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1331 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased green pod yield per plot to 4.80 kg versus control.

Taxon
Pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceuse3
Treatment
T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB)e1
Interactor
VAMe1symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
green pod yield/plote0
Direction
highe1
Value
4.80 kge0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green pod yield/plot (4.80 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB) showed significantly high growth, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1055 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1331 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased green pod yield per hectare to 80.12 q versus control.

Taxon
Pea (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceuse3
Treatment
T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB)e1
Interactor
VAMe1symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
green pod yield/hae0
Direction
highe1
Value
80.12 qe0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green pod yield/ha (80.12 q)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1310 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment T7 (50% RDF + 25 % VAM + 25% PSB) showed significantly high growth, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1055 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1331 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

240 papers: 216 positive, 24 negative or no effect

215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

mycorrhiza · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.