Paper · 2023 · Sinai Journal of Applied Sciences/Sinai Journal of Applied Sciences

INTERACTION BETTWEN BIOFERTILLIZER AND VARIETIES ON SOME SUGAR BEET (BETA VULGARIS L.) UNDER NEW RECLAIMED LANDS

Mohamed Awad; Hanan Mohamed; Maha El-Maleh; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at a private farm in Al-Qassasin City, Ismailia Governorate, Egypt, during two successive seasons 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 to assess the impact of seed inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacteria on the growth, root, sugar yields, and quality of different sugar beet varieties (Cleopatra, Senderla, and Capel) in sandy soil. There has been a recent increase in interest in bioorganic fertilizers as means to mitigate the negative effects of intensive farming practices. N-fixing microorganisms have an influence on plant nutrition and also play a crucial role in crop biofertilization as rhizobacteria that promote plant growth. The experimental design utilized a randomized complete block with three replication sub-plots. All treatments in the current study (inoculation of N-fixing bacteria) resulted in increased yield and its components compared to the untreated controls. The treatment of 100kgN/fad+900g Cerialine produced the best root yield of 43.91 ton/fad and the highest sugar yield of 5.31ton/fad in the second season. The highest root fresh weight of 996.5 g/plant was obtained at 210 days with Senderla in the first season. Cleopatra with 100kgN/fed+900g Cerialine had the highest root and sugar yield of 44.86 and 5.87 ton/fad, respectively in the second season. In comparison to the control, inoculating sugar beet seeds with 100 kg N/fad and 900 gm Cerialinee significantly increased sugar beet growth, quality, and productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased yield and its components versus untreated controls.

Treatment
inoculation of N-fixing bacteriae0
Interactor
N-fixing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments in the current study (inoculation of N-fixing bacteria) resulted in increased yield and its components compared to the untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified treatment produced the best root yield of 43.91 ton/fad in season two.

Treatment
100kgN/fad+900g Cerialinee0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
beste0
Value
43.91 ton/fade0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of 100kgN/fad+900g Cerialine produced the best root yield of 43.91 ton/fad and the highest sugar yield of 5.31ton/fad in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified treatment gave the highest sugar yield of 5.31ton/fad in season two.

Treatment
100kgN/fad+900g Cerialinee0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.31ton/fade0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of 100kgN/fad+900g Cerialine produced the best root yield of 43.91 ton/fad and the highest sugar yield of 5.31ton/fad in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Senderla reached the highest fresh root weight, 996.5 g/plant at 210 days in season one.

Material
Senderlae0
Outcome
root fresh weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
996.5 g/plante0
Qualifier
210 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest root fresh weight of 996.5 g/plant was obtained at 210 days with Senderla in the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleopatra with the specified treatment had the highest root yield, 44.86 ton/fad.

Material
Cleopatrae0
Treatment
100kgN/fed+900g Cerialinee0
Outcome
roote0
Direction
higheste0
Value
44.86 and 5.87 ton/fade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cleopatra with 100kgN/fed+900g Cerialine had the highest root and sugar yield of 44.86 and 5.87 ton/fad, respectively in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleopatra with the specified treatment had the highest sugar yield, 5.87 ton/fad.

Material
Cleopatrae0
Treatment
100kgN/fed+900g Cerialinee0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.87 ton/fade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cleopatra with 100kgN/fed+900g Cerialine had the highest root and sugar yield of 44.86 and 5.87 ton/fad, respectively in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation significantly increased growth, quality and productivity against control.

Treatment
inoculating sugar beet seeds with 100 kg N/fad and 900 gm Cerialineee0
Outcome
sugar beet growth, quality, and productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to the control, inoculating sugar beet seeds with 100 kg N/fad and 900 gm Cerialinee significantly increased sugar beet growth, quality, and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1476 · show in text ↑

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.