Paper · 2024 · Heliyon

Effects of different nitrogen fertilization systems on crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency – Results of a field experiment in southern Germany

Martin Mittermayer; Joseph Donauer; Stefan Kimmelmann; et al.

17
claims
17
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effects of the German Fertilizer Application Ordinance (GFO) on crop yield, nitrogen use efficiency and economical performance are highly controversial in science and practice in Germany. This study presents the results of a multi-year field experiment conducted at an experimental farm in southern Germany, in which the effects of different fertilizer systems on crop yield, protein concentration and nitrogen balance were analyzed. At this study site, relatively low N mineralization from the soil N pool was detected. Wheat ( triticum aestivum L.) and barley ( hordeum vulgare L.) showed strong yield declines from annual to multi-annual unfertilized plots, for maize ( zea mays L.), this yield decrease was not observed. The recommendations according to GFO meets the fertilizer requirement at the trial site well. A 20% reduction of fertilization compared to GFO resulted in a 5% yield reduction and a decrease in protein concentration of wheat and barley. According to the quadratic N response function, the GFO treatment was slightly below the economic optimum nitrogen rate (N opt ) for wheat, and close to N opt for winter barley on average over the trial years. For maize, a relatively high yield variability has been observed in the trial period so far. Sensor-based fertilization resulted in very high yields with high N use efficiency (up to 85%). This fertilization system can help to reduce nitrogen input and minimize nitrogen surplus. For wheat and barley, N fertilization and N uptake were well balanced, for maize clearly negative N surpluses were calculated. Despite all the discussion and criticism of GFO, the results of the plot trial show that high yields with high N use efficiency can be achieved with fertilization according to GFO.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low soil nitrogen mineralization was detected at the trial site.

Outcome
N mineralizatione0
Direction
relatively lowe0
Setting
study sitee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At this study site, relatively low N mineralization from the soil N pool was detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield declined from annual to multi-annual unfertilized plots.

Treatment
multi-annual unfertilized plotse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
declinese0
Comparator
annuale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat ( triticum aestivum L.) and barley ( hordeum vulgare L.) showed strong yield declines from annual to multi-annual unfertilized plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley yield declined from annual to multi-annual unfertilized plots.

Treatment
multi-annual unfertilized plotse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
declinese0
Comparator
annuale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat ( triticum aestivum L.) and barley ( hordeum vulgare L.) showed strong yield declines from annual to multi-annual unfertilized plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield did not show that decline.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
multi-annual unfertilized plotse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not observede0
Comparator
annuale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat ( triticum aestivum L.) and barley ( hordeum vulgare L.) showed strong yield declines from annual to multi-annual unfertilized plots, for maize ( zea mays L.), this yield decrease was not observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–727 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GFO recommendations met fertilizer requirements at the trial site.

Outcome
fertilizer requiremente0
Setting
trial sitee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The recommendations according to GFO meets the fertilizer requirement at the trial site well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 20% reduction in fertilization relative to GFO reduced yield by 5%.

Treatment
20% reduction of fertilizatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
5%e0
Comparator
GFOe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A 20% reduction of fertilization compared to GFO resulted in a 5% yield reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced fertilization decreased wheat protein concentration.

Treatment
20% reduction of fertilizatione0
Outcome
protein concentratione0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
GFOe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 20% reduction of fertilization compared to GFO resulted in a 5% yield reduction and a decrease in protein concentration of wheat and barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced fertilization decreased barley protein concentration.

Treatment
20% reduction of fertilizatione0
Outcome
protein concentratione0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
GFOe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 20% reduction of fertilization compared to GFO resulted in a 5% yield reduction and a decrease in protein concentration of wheat and barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–965 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

GFO fertilization was slightly below the economic optimum nitrogen rate for wheat.

Treatment
GFO treatmente0
Outcome
economic optimum nitrogen ratee0
Direction
slightly belowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the GFO treatment was slightly below the economic optimum nitrogen rate (N opt ) for wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

GFO fertilization was close to the economic optimum for winter barley.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Outcome
N opte0
Direction
close toe0
Qualifier
on average over the trial yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“close to N opt for winter barley on average over the trial years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1174 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield varied considerably over the trial period.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
yield variabilitye0
Direction
relatively highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For maize, a relatively high yield variability has been observed in the trial period so far.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensor-based fertilization produced high yields.

Treatment
Sensor-based fertilizatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
very highe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sensor-based fertilization resulted in very high yields with high N use efficiency (up to 85%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensor-based fertilization produced high nitrogen use efficiency up to 85%.

Treatment
Sensor-based fertilizatione0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
highe0
Value
up to 85%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sensor-based fertilization resulted in very high yields with high N use efficiency (up to 85%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1364 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat nitrogen fertilization and uptake were balanced.

Outcome
N fertilization and N uptakee0
Direction
well balancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For wheat and barley, N fertilization and N uptake were well balanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley nitrogen fertilization and uptake were balanced.

Outcome
N fertilization and N uptakee0
Direction
well balancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For wheat and barley, N fertilization and N uptake were well balanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize had negative nitrogen surpluses.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
N surplusese0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for maize clearly negative N surpluses were calculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1581 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GFO fertilization achieved high yields and high nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
fertilization according to GFOe0
Outcome
high yields with high N use efficiencye0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“high yields with high N use efficiency can be achieved with fertilization according to GFO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1762 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 64 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 501 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.