Paper · 2023 · Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi

Influence of Solid and Liquid Red California Vermicompost (Eisenia foetida) on Lactuca sativa var. crispa L

Tuğba ÖZBUCAK; Hülya ALAN

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, the effects of different doses and applications of vermicompost formed by composting cow manure with Red California Worm Eisenia fetida (Lumbricidae) on the growth, development, and pesticide resistance of L. sativa var. crispa (Lettuce) was tried to be determined. Vermicompost was applied in solid and liquid form at rates 10%, 20% and 30%. The leaf length, leaf width, chlorophyll amount (SPAD), number of marketable leaves, number of discarded leaves, leaf pH, leaf nitrogen content and pesticide residue analyze were examined in plant samples. In addition, texture, pH, organic matter, EC, total N, P, K, Mg and Ca analyzes were made in the soil samples and vermicompost used in the study. According to the statistical analysis results of the study, it was determined that all results except leaf pH, the number of discarded leaves and pesticide residue analyzes were statistically significant in terms of vermicompost type and dose. In all the parameters studied, solid vermicompost application have higher results than both the control and commercial liquid vermicompost. The highest leaf length and width values were determined at 20% dose of solid vermicompost, while chlorophyll amount and leaf nitrogen values were determined at 30% dose. The number of marketable leaves was the same in all doses of solid vermicompost application. However, it was no found statistically significant difference in pesticide residue analyzes in terms of vermicompost types, dose amounts and vermicompost type-dose interactions. The fungicide residue levels were above MRL (Maximum residue limits) in all studied samples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solid vermicompost gave higher results than the control and commercial liquid vermicompost in all parameters studied.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa var. crispaLactuca sativa var. crispat0
Treatment
solid vermicompost applicatione1
Outcome
parameters studiede1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
the control and commercial liquid vermicomposte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispa · TaxonCostaPPPR · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“In all the parameters studied, solid vermicompost application have higher results than both the control and commercial liquid vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1092 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost type and dose gave statistically significant differences in all lettuce results except leaf pH, discarded leaves and pesticide residue analyses.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa var. crispaLactuca sativa var. crispat0
Treatment
vermicompost type and dosee2
Outcome
all resultse2
Qualifier
except leaf pH, the number of discarded leaves and pesticide residue analyzese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispa · TaxonCostaPPPR · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“all results except leaf pH, the number of discarded leaves and pesticide residue analyzes were statistically significant in terms of vermicompost type and dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf length and leaf width were highest at the 20% dose of solid vermicompost.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa var. crispaLactuca sativa var. crispat0
Organ / stage
leafe3
Treatment
20% dose of solid vermicomposte3
Outcome
leaf length and width valuese3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispa · TaxonCostaPPPR · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest leaf length and width values were determined at 20% dose of solid vermicompost, while chlorophyll amount and leaf nitrogen values were determined at 30% dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll amount and leaf nitrogen were highest at the 30% dose of vermicompost.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa var. crispaLactuca sativa var. crispat0
Treatment
30% dosee3
Outcome
chlorophyll amount and leaf nitrogen valuese3
Direction
higherinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispa · TaxonCostaPPPR · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest leaf length and width values were determined at 20% dose of solid vermicompost, while chlorophyll amount and leaf nitrogen values were determined at 30% dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of marketable leaves was the same at all doses of solid vermicompost.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa var. crispaLactuca sativa var. crispat0
Treatment
all doses of solid vermicompost applicatione5
Outcome
number of marketable leavese5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispa · TaxonCostaPPPR · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–107 · show in text ↑
e5

“The number of marketable leaves was the same in all doses of solid vermicompost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No statistically significant difference in pesticide residue analyses was found among vermicompost types, doses or their interactions.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa var. crispaLactuca sativa var. crispat0
Treatment
vermicompost types, dose amounts and vermicompost type-dose interactionse6
Outcome
pesticide residue analyzese6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispa · TaxonCostaPPPR · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–107 · show in text ↑
e6

“it was no found statistically significant difference in pesticide residue analyzes in terms of vermicompost types, dose amounts and vermicompost type-dose interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1534 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide residue levels were above the maximum residue limits in all studied lettuce samples.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa var. crispaLactuca sativa var. crispat0
Outcome
fungicide residue levelse7
Qualifier
above MRL (Maximum residue limits) in all studied samplese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. crispa
Lactuca sativa var. crispa · TaxonCostaPPPR · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa var. crispa L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–107 · show in text ↑
e7

“The fungicide residue levels were above MRL (Maximum residue limits) in all studied samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1627 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 51 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

248 papers: 202 positive, 46 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

244 papers more in this group

See all 248 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.