Paper · 2024 · Journal of Central European Agriculture

Effect of inoculation with diazotrophs and treatment with solution of trace elements obtained by nanotechnology on wheat

Dmytro KIRIZIY; Sergii KOTS; Oleg STASIK; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

Currently, the importance of using new biotechnologies in crop cultivation, in particular the introduction of microbial inoculants and products obtained by nanotechnology, is increasing. However, the peculiarities of the interaction of microorganisms with plants when using such products have not been studied enough. The work aimed to study the effects of seed inoculation with a complex of rhizospheric diazotrophs (CRD) and treatment with a trace elements solution (TES) obtained by nanotechnology on CO2 net assimilation (An) and yield of winter wheat. Plants were grown in a pot experiment with the following treatments: 1 – control; 2 – seeds inoculation with diazotrophs (CRD); 3 – seeds treatment with trace element solution (TES); 4 – seeds treatment with CRD + TES seeds treatment; 5 – TES plants treatment at the heading stage; 6 – CRD seeds inoculation + TES plants treatment at the heading stage. The obtained results showed that the nitrogenase activity in the wheat plants' rhizosphere under CRD inoculation was significantly higher by 25% on average compared to the control and treatments with only TES. For all treatments, An at ripening stage exceeded the control level by 18–34%, and the plant grain productivity – by 17–27%. Significant correlations (r = 0.86–0.90) were found between the An at the ripening stage and the grain weight from the whole plant. It was concluded that the optimal combination was CRD seeds inoculation + TES seeds treatment, where the highest main shoot and the whole plant grain productivity were observed. The seed treatment with the trace element solution was more effective in increasing the main shoot productivity, while the treatment at the heading stage was more effective for the whole plant's productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with CRD raised rhizosphere nitrogenase activity in wheat by 25% on average relative to the control and TES-only treatments.

Treatment
CRD inoculatione1
Interactor
rhizospheric diazotrophse2symbiont
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
25%e1
Comparator
the control and treatments with only TESe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the nitrogenase activity in the wheat plants' rhizosphere under CRD inoculation was significantly higher by 25% on average compared to the control and treatments with only TES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1118 · show in text ↑
e2

“seed inoculation with a complex of rhizospheric diazotrophs (CRD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the ripening stage, net assimilation under all treatments exceeded the control level by 18–34%.

Treatment
all treatmentse3
Outcome
An at ripening stagee3
Direction
exceedede3
Value
18–34%e3
Comparator
the control levele3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“For all treatments, An at ripening stage exceeded the control level by 18–34%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1197 · show in text ↑
e0

“CO2 net assimilation (An) and yield of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under all treatments, whole-plant grain productivity exceeded the control level by 17–27%.

Treatment
all treatmentse3
Outcome
plant grain productivitye4
Direction
exceedede4
Value
17–27%e4
Comparator
the control levele4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“For all treatments, An at ripening stage exceeded the control level by 18–34%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1197 · show in text ↑
e4

“exceeded the control level by 18–34%, and the plant grain productivity – by 17–27%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1243 · show in text ↑
e0

“CO2 net assimilation (An) and yield of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–555 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The net assimilation at the ripening stage correlated significantly with whole-plant grain weight (r = 0.86–0.90).

Organ / stage
ripening stagee5
Outcome
grain weighte5
Value
r = 0.86–0.90e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Significant correlations (r = 0.86–0.90) were found between the An at the ripening stage and the grain weight from the whole plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1375 · show in text ↑
e0

“CO2 net assimilation (An) and yield of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–555 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal combination was CRD seed inoculation plus TES seed treatment, which gave the highest main shoot and whole-plant grain productivity.

Treatment
CRD seeds inoculation + TES seeds treatmente6
Outcome
main shoot and the whole plant grain productivitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“It was concluded that the optimal combination was CRD seeds inoculation + TES seeds treatment, where the highest main shoot and the whole plant grain productivity were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1553 · show in text ↑
e0

“CO2 net assimilation (An) and yield of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The seed treatment with trace element solution was more effective than the heading-stage treatment in increasing main shoot productivity.

Treatment
seed treatment with the trace element solutione7
Outcome
main shoot productivitye7
Direction
more effective in increasinge7
Comparator
the treatment at the heading stagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The seed treatment with the trace element solution was more effective in increasing the main shoot productivity, while the treatment at the heading stage was more effective for the whole plant's productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1762 · show in text ↑
e0

“CO2 net assimilation (An) and yield of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment at the heading stage was more effective than seed treatment for whole-plant productivity.

Treatment
the treatment at the heading stagee7
Outcome
whole plant's productivitye7
Direction
more effectivee7
Comparator
seed treatment with the trace element solutione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The seed treatment with the trace element solution was more effective in increasing the main shoot productivity, while the treatment at the heading stage was more effective for the whole plant's productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1762 · show in text ↑
e0

“CO2 net assimilation (An) and yield of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–555 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.