Paper · 2024 · Agronomy Journal

Corn response to strip‐tillage and phosphorus fertilization in the Northern Great Plains

Magdalena Rogalsky; Kevin H. D. Tiessen; Don Flaten; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Strip‐tillage is an emerging conservation tillage/residue management system for corn production in the Northern Great Plains. Producers in Manitoba are becoming more interested in strip‐tillage as it may provide many of the soil conservation benefits of no‐tillage production without potential limitations of cold soils in the spring common to this region. A 2‐year study evaluated corn ( Zea mays L.) response to phosphorus (P) fertilization in strip‐tillage and conventional tillage systems. Fertilization treatments included a control (no P), two rates of P (30 and 60 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 ), applied as monoammonium phosphate (11–52–0) either in the fall with a strip‐tillage unit (as a deep‐band, 10–13 cm deep) or in the spring with a corn planter (as a side‐band, 5 cm beside and 2.5 cm below the seed). Spring side‐banded P treatments increased early‐season biomass at 2 of 4 site‐years by up to 103% compared to the unfertilized controls. At the same 2 site‐years, banded P treatments reduced days to silking by 2–3 days, compared to the unfertilized controls. Across all site‐years, spring side‐banded P treatments increased grain yield by an average of 467 kg ha −1 and decreased grain moisture content by 9 g kg −1 compared to the unfertilized control. Overall, side‐banded P at planting was agronomically superior to precision fall deep‐banding. There was also no agronomic penalty for corn grown with strip‐tillage, compared to conventional tillage, suggesting that strip‐tillage is an agronomically promising practice for corn production in southern Manitoba.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring side-banded phosphorus raised early corn biomass by up to 103% at two site-years.

Treatment
Spring side‐banded P treatmentse0
Outcome
early‐season biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
103%e0
Qualifier
2 of 4 site‐yearse0
Comparator
unfertilized controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring side‐banded P treatments increased early‐season biomass at 2 of 4 site‐years by up to 103% compared to the unfertilized controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded phosphorus shortened time to silking by 2–3 days.

Treatment
banded P treatmentse0
Outcome
days to silkinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2–3 dayse0
Comparator
unfertilized controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“banded P treatments reduced days to silking by 2–3 days, compared to the unfertilized controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring side-banded phosphorus increased grain yield by an average of 467 kg ha −1.

Treatment
spring side‐banded P treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
467 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
unfertilized controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring side‐banded P treatments increased grain yield by an average of 467 kg ha −1 and decreased grain moisture content by 9 g kg −1 compared to the unfertilized control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring side-banded phosphorus decreased grain moisture content by 9 g kg −1.

Treatment
spring side‐banded P treatmentse0
Outcome
grain moisture contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
9 g kg −1e0
Comparator
unfertilized controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring side‐banded P treatments increased grain yield by an average of 467 kg ha −1 and decreased grain moisture content by 9 g kg −1 compared to the unfertilized control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Side-banded phosphorus at planting was agronomically superior to fall deep-banding.

Outcome
agronomically superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
precision fall deep‐bandinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“side‐banded P at planting was agronomically superior to precision fall deep‐banding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip tillage had no agronomic penalty relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
strip‐tillagee0
Outcome
agronomic penaltye0
Direction
no agronomic penaltye0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no agronomic penalty for corn grown with strip‐tillage, compared to conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1467 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · phenology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

phosphorus · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 252 positive, 54 negative or no effect

251 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.