Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Impact of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth and Properties of Soil in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

Amit Kumar Mehta; Sanjay Kumar Shahi; Shravan Kumar Maurya; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on sandy loam soil at Udai Pratap (Autonomous) College, Varanasi with sunflower, variety PSH-50 as test crop during Zaid season (2020-2021) to study the impact of integrated use of inorganic fertilizers, FYM and bio-fertilizers on performance of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and soil properties. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design (RBD) with four replications. The treatments were T1 (control), T2 (50% RDF), T3 (100% RDF), T4 (125% RDF), T5 (50% RDF + 15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter), T6 (75% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter) and T7 (100% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter). It is evident from the results that maximum plant height, number of leaves, capitulum diameter, test weight and oil content were obtained with treatment T6 (75% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter). It was also found that nutrient availability (NPKS) and nutrient uptake (NPKS) was also superior in treatment T6 (75% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 produced maximum plant height, leaf number and capitulum diameter.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
T6 (75% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter)e0
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, capitulum diametere0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum plant height, number of leaves, capitulum diameter, test weight and oil content were obtained with treatment T6 (75% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 produced maximum test weight and oil content.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
T6 (75% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter)e0
Outcome
test weight and oil contente0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum plant height, number of leaves, capitulum diameter, test weight and oil content were obtained with treatment T6 (75% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPKS availability was superior under T6.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
T6 (75% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter)e0
Outcome
nutrient availability (NPKS)e0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient availability (NPKS) and nutrient uptake (NPKS) was also superior in treatment T6 (75% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPKS uptake was superior under T6.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
T6 (75% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter)e0
Outcome
nutrient uptake (NPKS)e0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient availability (NPKS) and nutrient uptake (NPKS) was also superior in treatment T6 (75% RDF +15 tons FYM ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–109 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

89 papers: 76 positive, 13 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 64 positive, 7 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

fertilization · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 134 positive, 12 negative or no effect

133 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.