Paper · 2024 · Journal of Hazardous Materials

Impact of Fe3O4-porphyrin hybrid nanoparticles on wheat: Physiological and metabolic advance

Gonçalo Gamito; Carlos JP Monteiro; Maria Celeste Dias; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Iron-magnetic nanoparticles (Fe-NMPs) are widely used in environmental remediation, while porphyrin-based hybrid materials anchored to silica-coated Fe3O4-nanoparticles (Fe3O4-NPs) have been used for water disinfection purposes. To assess their safety on plants, especially concerning potential environmental release, it was investigated for the first time, the impact on plants of a silica-coated Fe3O4-NPs bearing a porphyrinic formulation (FORM) - FORM@NMP. Additionally, FORM alone and the magnetic nanoparticles without FORM anchored (NH2@NMP) were used for comparison. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was chosen as a model species and was subjected to three environmentally relevant doses during germination and tiller development through root application. Morphological, physiological, and metabolic parameters were assessed. Despite a modest biomass decrease and alterations in membrane properties, no major impairments in germination or seedling development were observed. During tiller phase, both Fe3O4-NPs increased leaf length, and photosynthesis exhibited varied impacts: both Fe3O4-NPs and FORM alone increased pigments; only Fe3O4-NPs promoted gas exchange; all treatments improved the photochemical phase. Regarding oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation decreased in FORM and FORM@NMP, yet with increased O2-• in FORM@NMP; total flavonoids decreased in NH2@NMP and antioxidant enzymes declined across all materials. Phenolic profiling revealed a generalized trend towards a decrease in flavones. In conclusion, these nanoparticles can modulate wheat physiology/metabolism without apparently inducing phytotoxicity at low doses and during short-time exposure. Iron-magnetic nanoparticles are widely used in environmental remediation and fertilization, besides of new applications continuously being developed, making them emerging contaminants. Soil is a major sink for these nanoparticles and their fate and potential environmental risks in ecosystems must be addressed to achieve more sustainable environmental applications. Furthermore, as the reuse of treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation is being claimed, it is of major importance to disclose the impact on crops of the nanoparticles used for wastewater decontamination, such as those proposed in this work.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure caused a modest biomass decrease.

Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite a modest biomass decrease and alterations in membrane properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–902 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure altered membrane properties.

Outcome
membrane propertiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alterations in membrane properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–902 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No major impairment in germination or seedling development was observed.

Outcome
germination or seedling developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no major impairments in germination or seedling development were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–977 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both Fe3O4 nanoparticles increased leaf length during tillering.

Organ / stage
tiller phasee0
Treatment
both Fe3O4-NPse0
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During tiller phase, both Fe3O4-NPs increased leaf length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1036 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both Fe3O4 nanoparticles increased pigments.

Treatment
both Fe3O4-NPse0
Outcome
pigmentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both Fe3O4-NPs and FORM alone increased pigments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FORM alone increased pigments.

Treatment
FORM alonee0
Outcome
pigmentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both Fe3O4-NPs and FORM alone increased pigments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only Fe3O4 nanoparticles promoted gas exchange.

Treatment
Fe3O4-NPse0
Outcome
gas exchangee0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only Fe3O4-NPs promoted gas exchange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1169 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments improved the photochemical phase.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
photochemical phasee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all treatments improved the photochemical phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1218 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FORM decreased lipid peroxidation.

Treatment
FORMe0
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lipid peroxidation decreased in FORM and FORM@NMP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1297 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FORM@NMP decreased lipid peroxidation.

Treatment
FORM@NMPe0
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lipid peroxidation decreased in FORM and FORM@NMP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1297 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FORM@NMP increased O2-•.

Treatment
FORM@NMPe0
Outcome
O2-•e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased O2-• in FORM@NMP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1334 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NH2@NMP decreased total flavonoids.

Treatment
NH2@NMPe0
Outcome
total flavonoidse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total flavonoids decreased in NH2@NMP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1373 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All materials decreased antioxidant enzymes.

Treatment
all materialse0
Outcome
antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidant enzymes declined across all materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic profiling showed a general decrease in flavones.

Outcome
flavonese0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phenolic profiling revealed a generalized trend towards a decrease in flavones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1507 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded low dose, short exposure can modulate physiology without apparent phytotoxicity.

Outcome
physiology/metabolisme0
Qualifier
low doses and during short-time exposuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these nanoparticles can modulate wheat physiology/metabolism without apparently inducing phytotoxicity at low doses and during short-time exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1670 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 51 positive, 6 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.