Paper · 2024 · Heliyon

Synergistic effects of coal waste derived humic substances and inorganic fertilizer as soil amendments for barley in sandy soil

Yihan Zhao; M. Anne Naeth

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Increasing pressures on land resources requires increased land use efficiency. Over 900 million ha of sandy soils throughout the world are extensively used for agricultural crop production, most requiring nutrient inputs. Although use of humic substances together with inorganic fertilizer as soil amendments has been introduced, their synergistic effects on plant growth in sandy soils are not well addressed. We assessed the efficacy of a lignite waste derived humic substance on barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) growth, with and without inorganic fertilizer. Ten treatments were applied to sandy soils, comprising sole application of the humic product at four rates (NH1, NH2, NH3, NH4), sole application of fertilizer (F), and their combinations (F+NH1, F+NH2, F+NH3, F+NH4). Synergistic effects of nano humus and fertilizer were more notable than the corresponding sole application, particularly on plant biomass and seed production. Combined application with inorganic fertilizer increased root biomass by 92 % (0.1 g per plant ), shoot biomass by 80 % (0.5 g per plant), root length by 24 % (3.6 cm), and seed production by 38 % (5 seeds per head) averagely relative to the untreated control, suggesting a strong synergistic effect. The increased seed production was particularly important from an agricultural perspective. Four application rates of nano humus all showed beneficial effects on barley growth with no significant differences. The most distinct positive effect of the humic product as a sole application was on root growth. Our study confirmed that a lignite waste derived humic product, nano humus, together with fertilizer may be an effective soil amendment to enhance agricultural plant growth in sandy soil regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nano humus and fertilizer had more notable synergistic effects on biomass and seed production than sole applications.

Treatment
nano humus and fertilizere0
Outcome
plant biomass and seed productione0
Direction
more notablee0
Comparator
corresponding sole applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Synergistic effects of nano humus and fertilizer were more notable than the corresponding sole application, particularly on plant biomass and seed production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application increased barley root biomass by 92% relative to untreated control.

Treatment
Combined application with inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
92 %e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application with inorganic fertilizer increased root biomass by 92 % (0.1 g per plant ), shoot biomass by 80 % (0.5 g per plant), root length by 24 % (3.6 cm), and seed production by 38 % (5 seeds per head) averagely relative to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application increased barley shoot biomass by 80% relative to untreated control.

Treatment
Combined application with inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
80 %e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application with inorganic fertilizer increased root biomass by 92 % (0.1 g per plant ), shoot biomass by 80 % (0.5 g per plant), root length by 24 % (3.6 cm), and seed production by 38 % (5 seeds per head) averagely relative to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application increased barley root length by 24% relative to untreated control.

Treatment
Combined application with inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
24 %e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application with inorganic fertilizer increased root biomass by 92 % (0.1 g per plant ), shoot biomass by 80 % (0.5 g per plant), root length by 24 % (3.6 cm), and seed production by 38 % (5 seeds per head) averagely relative to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application increased barley seed production by 38% relative to untreated control.

Treatment
Combined application with inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
seed productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38 %e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application with inorganic fertilizer increased root biomass by 92 % (0.1 g per plant ), shoot biomass by 80 % (0.5 g per plant), root length by 24 % (3.6 cm), and seed production by 38 % (5 seeds per head) averagely relative to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All four nano humus application rates benefited barley growth without significant differences among rates.

Treatment
Four application rates of nano humuse0
Outcome
barley growthe0
Direction
beneficial effectse0
Comparator
no significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four application rates of nano humus all showed beneficial effects on barley growth with no significant differences.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole humic product application had its most distinct positive effect on root growth.

Treatment
humic product as a sole applicatione0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most distinct positive effect of the humic product as a sole application was on root growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1540 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑

other · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 25 positive, 10 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 138 positive, 27 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.