Paper · 2024 · Horticulturae

MdSGR2 Negatively Regulates Chlorophyll Degradation in Apple

Shiyi Xue; Pei Yao; Jiwei Kang; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The color of an apple is an important index of its appearance quality, which affects the fruit’s marketability and value. The green variety “Granny Smith” remains green when ripe, and the pigment in the peel is mainly chlorophyll. The chlorophyll in the peel of the yellow variety “Golden Delicious” degrades as the fruit ripens. To explore the different mechanisms of chlorophyll degradation in the “Golden Delicious” and “Granny Smith” varieties, transcriptomic analysis was performed on the mature peels of both cultivars. High-quality sequences totaling 48,206,940 and 48,796,646 raw bases, as well as 9632 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), were identified. A total of 1206 DEGs were classified in 118 KEGG metabolic pathways. Additionally, 3258 transcription factors from 428 gene families were predicted, and DEGs associated with chlorophyll degradation, including MdSGR2, MdNYC1 and MdHCAR, were identified. Subsequently, the MdSGR2 gene was isolated from the mature peel of “Granny Smith” apples. Subsequent subcellular localization analysis confirmed that MdSGR2 specifically targets chloroplasts. The transient overexpression of MdSGR2 was found to negatively regulate chlorophyll degradation, leading to the inhibition or deceleration of chlorophyll breakdown, thereby maintaining green coloration in the leaves and peel. Conversely, silencing MdSGR2 positively regulated chlorophyll degradation, resulting in chlorosis in the leaves and peel. These findings offer valuable insights into the regulatory mechanism governing apple fruit coloration and lays a solid foundation for further investigation in this field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The peel transcriptomes yielded 48,206,940 and 48,796,646 raw bases.

Outcome
High-quality sequencese0
Value
48,206,940 and 48,796,646 raw basese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High-quality sequences totaling 48,206,940 and 48,796,646 raw bases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar peel comparison identified 9632 differentially expressed genes.

Outcome
differentially expressed genese0
Value
9632e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“9632 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A total of 1206 differentially expressed genes were classified in 118 KEGG pathways.

Outcome
DEGs were classified in 118 KEGG metabolic pathwayse0
Value
1206 DEGse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 1206 DEGs were classified in 118 KEGG metabolic pathways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The analysis predicted 3258 transcription factors from 428 gene families.

Outcome
transcription factorse0
Value
3258e0
Qualifier
428 gene familiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3258 transcription factors from 428 gene families were predicted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study identified MdSGR2, MdNYC1 and MdHCAR among genes associated with chlorophyll degradation.

Gene
MdSGR2, MdNYC1 and MdHCARe0
Outcome
DEGs associated with chlorophyll degradatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DEGs associated with chlorophyll degradation, including MdSGR2, MdNYC1 and MdHCAR, were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MdSGR2 localized specifically to chloroplasts.

Gene
MdSGR2e0
Outcome
targets chloroplastse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MdSGR2 specifically targets chloroplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transient MdSGR2 overexpression inhibited or slowed chlorophyll breakdown and maintained green leaf and peel coloration.

Organ / stage
leaves and peele0
Treatment
transient overexpression of MdSGR2e0
Gene
MdSGR2e0
Outcome
chlorophyll degradatione0
Direction
negatively regulatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The transient overexpression of MdSGR2 was found to negatively regulate chlorophyll degradation, leading to the inhibition or deceleration of chlorophyll breakdown, thereby maintaining green coloration in the leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing MdSGR2 promoted chlorophyll degradation and caused chlorosis in leaves and peel.

Organ / stage
leaves and peele0
Treatment
silencing MdSGR2e0
Gene
MdSGR2e0
Outcome
chlorophyll degradatione0
Direction
positively regulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silencing MdSGR2 positively regulated chlorophyll degradation, resulting in chlorosis in the leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑

loss of function · physiology: pigments · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.