Paper · 2024 · Plants

Drip Fertigation Enhances the Responses of Grain Yield and Quality to Nitrogen Topdressing Rate in Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China

Jin Tong; Yulei Xiong; Yu Lu; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Conventional water and nitrogen (N) management practice in north China, comprising flood irrigation and N fertilizer broadcast (FB), limits sustainable wheat production. Drip fertigation (DF) has been widely adopted in wheat production in recent years and has effectively improved yields. However, the responses of the yield and quality to the N topdressing rate (NTR) under DF are still unclear. This study determined the responses of the wheat yield and quality to NTR under DF, as well as assessing whether DF could synergistically increase the yield and quality. A field experiment was conducted in north China for two seasons (2021–2023) using a split-plot design with three replicates. The main plot used the management practice (FB and DF) and the sub-plot had N treatment (no N applied, and NTRs of 0, 40, 80, 120, and 160 kg ha−1 with 150 kg N ha−1 as basal fertilizer, denoted as N0, T0, T40, T80, T120, and T160, respectively). Our results showed that high and saturated wheat yields (12.08 and 11.46 t ha−1) were obtained under DF at T80, and the highest yields were produced at T160 (11.71 and 11.30 t ha−1) under FB. Compared with FB, the greatest yield increase of 10.4–12.6% was achieved at T80 under DF. A higher spike number due to the increased effective stem percentage and a greater grain weight because of enhanced post-anthesis biomass production (BPpost) explained the improved yield under DF. The enhanced post-anthesis radiation use efficiency (RUE) led to the greater BPpost under DF. The enhanced specific leaf N, antioxidant capacity, and stomatal conductance under DF explained the higher light-saturated photosynthesis rate of flag leaves, which partly led to the increased post-anthesis RUE. NTR higher than 80 kg ha−1 did not enhance the yield, but it significantly improved the gliadin and glutelin contents, thereby leading to a higher total protein content, better gluten characteristics, and superior processing quality. Therefore, drip fertigation is a practical strategy for increasing both yield and quality with reduced water input and appropriate N input in irrigated winter wheat in north China. Applying 80 kg ha−1 of NTR under drip irrigation produces a high yield, but further gain in grain quality needs a higher NTR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drip fertigation at T80, wheat yields were 12.08 and 11.46 t ha−1 across two seasons.

Treatment
DF at T80e0
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
highe0
Value
12.08 and 11.46 t ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high and saturated wheat yields (12.08 and 11.46 t ha−1) were obtained under DF at T80”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under broadcast fertilization at T160, highest yields were 11.71 and 11.30 t ha−1.

Treatment
T160e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.71 and 11.30 t ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest yields were produced at T160 (11.71 and 11.30 t ha−1) under FB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At T80, drip fertigation increased yield by 10.4–12.6% compared with broadcast fertilization.

Treatment
DFe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10.4–12.6%e0
Qualifier
T80e0
Comparator
FBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with FB, the greatest yield increase of 10.4–12.6% was achieved at T80 under DF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation increased spike number through a higher effective stem percentage.

Treatment
DFe1
Outcome
spike numbere0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
increased effective stem percentagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher spike number due to the increased effective stem percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“improved yield under DF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation increased grain weight through enhanced post-anthesis biomass production.

Treatment
DFe1
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
enhanced post-anthesis biomass productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greater grain weight because of enhanced post-anthesis biomass production (BPpost)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1378 · show in text ↑
e1

“improved yield under DF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced post-anthesis radiation use efficiency increased post-anthesis biomass production under drip fertigation.

Treatment
DFe0
Outcome
BPposte0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
enhanced post-anthesis radiation use efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enhanced post-anthesis radiation use efficiency (RUE) led to the greater BPpost under DF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drip fertigation, enhanced specific leaf nitrogen, antioxidant capacity, and stomatal conductance explained higher flag-leaf photosynthesis.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Treatment
DFe0
Outcome
light-saturated photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
enhanced specific leaf N, antioxidant capacity, and stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enhanced specific leaf N, antioxidant capacity, and stomatal conductance under DF explained the higher light-saturated photosynthesis rate of flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher flag-leaf photosynthesis partly increased post-anthesis radiation use efficiency.

Outcome
post-anthesis RUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
higher light-saturated photosynthesis rate of flag leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher light-saturated photosynthesis rate of flag leaves, which partly led to the increased post-anthesis RUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen topdressing above 80 kg ha−1 did not enhance wheat yield.

Treatment
NTR higher than 80 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not enhancee0
Comparator
80 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NTR higher than 80 kg ha−1 did not enhance the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1776 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen topdressing above 80 kg ha−1 significantly increased gliadin and glutelin contents.

Treatment
NTR higher than 80 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
gliadin and glutelin contentse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
80 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NTR higher than 80 kg ha−1 did not enhance the yield, but it significantly improved the gliadin and glutelin contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1841 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher gliadin and glutelin contents led to higher total protein content.

Outcome
total protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
gliadin and glutelin contentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gliadin and glutelin contents, thereby leading to a higher total protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen topdressing above 80 kg ha−1 improved gluten characteristics.

Treatment
NTR higher than 80 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
gluten characteristicse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
80 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NTR higher than 80 kg ha−1 did not enhance the yield, but it significantly improved the gliadin and glutelin contents, thereby leading to a higher total protein content, better gluten characteristics, and superior processing quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen topdressing above 80 kg ha−1 improved processing quality.

Treatment
NTR higher than 80 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
processing qualitye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
80 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NTR higher than 80 kg ha−1 did not enhance the yield, but it significantly improved the gliadin and glutelin contents, thereby leading to a higher total protein content, better gluten characteristics, and superior processing quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend drip fertigation with suitable nitrogen input to raise wheat yield and quality while reducing water input.

Treatment
drip fertigatione0
Outcome
increasing both yield and qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip fertigation is a practical strategy for increasing both yield and quality with reduced water input and appropriate N input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1969–2096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 80 kg ha−1 nitrogen topdressing under drip irrigation for high yield, with a higher rate for further grain-quality gain.

Treatment
80 kg ha−1 of NTR under drip irrigatione0
Outcome
a high yielde0
Qualifier
further gain in grain quality needs a higher NTRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 80 kg ha−1 of NTR under drip irrigation produces a high yield, but further gain in grain quality needs a higher NTR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2139–2263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Winter Wheat in North China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–136 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 146 positive, 27 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.