Claim · model-written summary
Under no tillage, yield response to drip fertigation was 26.3–28.5%.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Drip Fertigationt0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 26.3–28.5%e0
- Qualifier
- NTe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NT had the highest response in yield of 26.3–28.5%”
t0“Wheat Yield, Biomass, and Radiation Interception and Utilization Under Conservation Tillage: Greater Response to Drip Fertigation Compared to Intensive Tillage”
Title
Yuechao Wang; Jinxiao Song; Wen Li; et al. Agronomy 2024. doi:10.3390/agronomy14122849
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Drip fertigation increased wheat yield by 11.0–28.5%, depending on tillage.
- Observation Rotary tillage had a yield response of 14.6–15.1%.
- Observation Plow then rotary tillage had a yield response of 11.0–11.9%.
- Intervention effect Drip fertigation increased grains per ear and ear number under no tillage.
- Association Greater maximum stem number contributed to yield gain under drip fertigation and no tillage.
- Intervention effect Post-anthesis biomass was promoted by 36.7–47.3%.
- Association Increased solar radiation interception and radiation use efficiency after anthesis contributed to biomass gain.
- Association Extended post-anthesis duration benefited biomass and yield.
- Recommendation The authors recommend optimizing water and nitrogen management under conservation tillage.