Paper · 2018 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Grain Yield and Yield Components of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Different Integrated Management of Dodder

Siavosh Shamsi; Adel Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasa; Rouhollah Amini

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Farm of University of Tabriz in 2015 to evaluate the effects of integrated management of dodder on some growth parameters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with three replications. Treatments were trifluralin (2 L.ha-1) + wheat straw mulch, wheat straw mulch + glyphosate application (75 g a.i. ha-1), irrigation after 15 days + naphthalene acetic acid, chlorthal dimethyl application (10 kg.ha-1) + irrigation after 15 days, tillage + wheat straw mulch, wheat straw mulch + irrigation after 15 days, trifluralin and chlorthal dimethyl application. The highest grain yield of chickpea was obtained in chlorthal dimethyl application and wheat straw mulch + glyphosate application (respectively 2764 and 2617 kg.ha-1) that were higher than those of other management treatments. The highest biomass of dodder was observed in wheat straw mulch + irrigation every 15 days. Results indicated that use of wheat straw mulch and irrigation after 15 days were not high enough to prevent the spread of dodder. Generally in treatments that only the non-chemical manageemnts were used the dodder infestation was occured and led to chickpea grain yield loss. Therefore, it seems that integration of cultural control (mulch application) with chemical control could be suitable option for dodder management in the chickpea fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorthal dimethyl gave the highest chickpea grain yield, 2764 kg.ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
chlorthal dimethyl applicatione0
Interactor
doddere1weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2764e0
Comparator
other management treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield of chickpea was obtained in chlorthal dimethyl application and wheat straw mulch + glyphosate application (respectively 2764 and 2617 kg.ha-1) that were higher than those of other management treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–903 · show in text ↑
e1

“management of dodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw mulch plus glyphosate gave chickpea grain yield of 2617 kg.ha-1, higher than other management treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
wheat straw mulch + glyphosate applicatione0
Interactor
doddere1weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2617 kg.ha-1e0
Comparator
other management treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield of chickpea was obtained in chlorthal dimethyl application and wheat straw mulch + glyphosate application (respectively 2764 and 2617 kg.ha-1) that were higher than those of other management treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–903 · show in text ↑
e1

“management of dodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw mulch plus irrigation every 15 days yielded the highest dodder biomass.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
wheat straw mulch + irrigation every 15 dayse0
Interactor
doddere0weed
Outcome
biomass of doddere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest biomass of dodder was observed in wheat straw mulch + irrigation every 15 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–995 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth parameters of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch and irrigation after 15 days failed to prevent dodder spread.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
wheat straw mulch and irrigation after 15 dayse0
Interactor
doddere0weed
Outcome
spread of doddere0
Direction
not high enough to prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of wheat straw mulch and irrigation after 15 days were not high enough to prevent the spread of dodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth parameters of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonchemical management was associated with dodder infestation and chickpea grain yield loss.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
non-chemical manageemntse0
Interactor
doddere0weed
Outcome
chickpea grain yield losse0
Direction
losse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in treatments that only the non-chemical manageemnts were used the dodder infestation was occured and led to chickpea grain yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1271 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combining mulch with chemical control for dodder management in chickpea fields.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
doddere0weed
Outcome
integration of cultural control (mulch application) with chemical controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of cultural control (mulch application) with chemical control could be suitable option for dodder management in the chickpea fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1441 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Triticum aestivum · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

organic · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

organic · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.