Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Co-inoculation of Glomus and Pseudomonas enhances the cadmium stress tolerance in maize plants (Zea mays)

T Sivasankari Devi; S Selvaraj; T Sivasakthi Devi; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cadmium tolerant Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) fungi Glomus sp. (AM1) and bacteria Pseudomonas sp. (PS1) were isolated from the soil polluted with high concentration of cadmium in Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu. These isolates along with two standard cultures G. mosseae (AM s) and P. putida (PS s) in sole and combinations were used for green house experiment in Cd spiked soil at varying levels of Cd (0, 75 and 125 ppm). Observations were recorded in the maize plants on 30 and 60 DAS. The combined inoculation of AM fungi with Pseudomonas sp. was found to be effective in enhancing the growth of the plant and tolerance of incremental levels of Cd compared with sole inoculation and uninoculated control. G. mosseae (AM S) with Pseudomonas sp. (PS 1) inoculated plants registered highest total chlorophyll content (28.9 percent increase over sole inoculation of G. mosseae (AM S)). Total phenol content (3.1 µg of catechol produced/g) and soluble protein content in root (5.79 mg/g) was evidenced higher in Glomus sp. (AM 1) with Pseudomonas sp. (PS 1) inoculated plants at 125 ppm of Cd on 30 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined AM fungi and Pseudomonas inoculation enhanced maize growth compared with sole inoculation and uninoculated control.

Taxon
maize plantsZea mayst0
Treatment
combined inoculation of AM fungi with Pseudomonas sp.e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Second interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
growth of the plante0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
sole inoculation and uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined inoculation of AM fungi with Pseudomonas sp. was found to be effective in enhancing the growth of the plant and tolerance of incremental levels of Cd compared with sole inoculation and uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined AM fungi and Pseudomonas inoculation enhanced tolerance to increasing Cd levels compared with sole inoculation and uninoculated control.

Taxon
maize plantsZea mayst0
Treatment
combined inoculation of AM fungi with Pseudomonas sp.e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Second interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
tolerance of incremental levels of Cde0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
sole inoculation and uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined inoculation of AM fungi with Pseudomonas sp. was found to be effective in enhancing the growth of the plant and tolerance of incremental levels of Cd compared with sole inoculation and uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. mosseae with Pseudomonas sp. produced the highest total chlorophyll content, 28.9 percent above sole G. mosseae inoculation.

Taxon
maize plantsZea mayst0
Treatment
G. mosseae (AM S) with Pseudomonas sp. (PS 1)e0
Interactor
G. mosseae (AM S)Funneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. (PS 1)Pseudomonas sp.e0symbiont
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
28.9 percente0
Comparator
sole inoculation of G. mosseae (AM S)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. mosseae (AM S) with Pseudomonas sp. (PS 1) inoculated plants registered highest total chlorophyll content (28.9 percent increase over sole inoculation of G. mosseae (AM S))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus sp. with Pseudomonas sp. had higher total phenol content at 125 ppm Cd on day 30.

Taxon
maize plantsZea mayst0
Treatment
Glomus sp. (AM 1) with Pseudomonas sp. (PS 1)e0
Interactor
Glomus sp. (AM 1)Glomus sp.e0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. (PS 1)Pseudomonas sp.e0symbiont
Outcome
Total phenol contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.1 µg of catechol produced/ge0
Qualifier
at 125 ppm of Cd on 30 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glomus sp.
Glomus sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Jerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenol content (3.1 µg of catechol produced/g) and soluble protein content in root (5.79 mg/g) was evidenced higher in Glomus sp. (AM 1) with Pseudomonas sp. (PS 1) inoculated plants at 125 ppm of Cd on 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus sp. with Pseudomonas sp. had higher root soluble protein content at 125 ppm Cd on day 30.

Taxon
maize plantsZea mayst0
Treatment
Glomus sp. (AM 1) with Pseudomonas sp. (PS 1)e0
Interactor
Glomus sp. (AM 1)Glomus sp.e0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. (PS 1)Pseudomonas sp.e0symbiont
Outcome
soluble protein content in roote0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.79 mg/ge0
Qualifier
at 125 ppm of Cd on 30 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glomus sp.
Glomus sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Jerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenol content (3.1 µg of catechol produced/g) and soluble protein content in root (5.79 mg/g) was evidenced higher in Glomus sp. (AM 1) with Pseudomonas sp. (PS 1) inoculated plants at 125 ppm of Cd on 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Funneliformis mosseae · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pseudomonas · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Pseudomonas · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: phytochemicals · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 93 positive, 67 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.