Paper · 2024 · Arid Land Research and Management

Effects of different cycocel doses and irrigation levels on grain production, quality characteristics and water use in bread wheat

Nurlykhan Bimurzayev; Ahmet Kurunc

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cycocel (CCC) is a synthetic substance widely used as a growth retardant in grain crops. The importance of CCC is greater under different stress conditions. In this study, the effects of different CCC doses (D0 = 0, D1 = 750, D2 = 1500, and D3 = 2250 g ha−1) and different irrigation levels (I0 = 100% as control, I1 = 75%, I2 = 50%, and I3 = 25%) on some agro-morphological characteristics, yield and quality parameters, and crop water use characteristics in a semi-dwarf bread wheat variety were investigated. The internode length, number of grains, grain weight per spike, biological yield and grain yield values showed significant reductions, especially under I3, regardless of CCC applications. Grain yields varied between 2.31-6.14 and 2.28-4.43 kg ha−1 in 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, respectively. There was no significant difference in crop water consumption among different CCC doses under the same irrigation level. The effects of increasing water stress on the decrease in plant height were greater than that of increasing CCC application. Under I3 and increasing CCC applications, the spike length was significantly reduced. The protein content, sedimentation, wet gluten ratio, and gluten index values increased significantly, especially under I2 and I3. Plant yield response factors for both biological (0.85-0.90 in 2019-2020 and 0.74-0.99 in 2020-2021) and grain yields (0.77-0.90 in 2019-2020 and 0.77-0.1.12 in 2020-2021) varied between years depending on CCC applications and climatic conditions. The foliar CCC application for the purpose of increasing crop yield during drought season might not be recommendable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe irrigation deficit significantly reduced wheat internode length, grain number and grain weight per spike.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
I3e0
Outcome
internode length, number of grains, grain weight per spikee0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The internode length, number of grains, grain weight per spike, biological yield and grain yield values showed significant reductions, especially under I3, regardless of CCC applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe irrigation deficit significantly reduced biological and grain yield.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
I3e0
Outcome
biological yield and grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The internode length, number of grains, grain weight per spike, biological yield and grain yield values showed significant reductions, especially under I3, regardless of CCC applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield ranged from 2.31-6.14 kg ha−1 in 2019-2020.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Value
2.31-6.14e0
Qualifier
2019-2020e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields varied between 2.31-6.14 and 2.28-4.43 kg ha−1 in 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield ranged from 2.28-4.43 kg ha−1 in 2020-2021.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Value
2.28-4.43 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
2020-2021e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields varied between 2.31-6.14 and 2.28-4.43 kg ha−1 in 2019-2020 and 2020-2021, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop water consumption did not significantly differ among CCC doses at a given irrigation level.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
different CCC dosese0
Outcome
crop water consumptione0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
same irrigation levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in crop water consumption among different CCC doses under the same irrigation level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing water stress decreased plant height more than increasing CCC application.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing water stresse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
increasing CCC applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of increasing water stress on the decrease in plant height were greater than that of increasing CCC application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under I3, increasing CCC application significantly reduced spike length.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing CCC applicationse0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
Under I3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under I3 and increasing CCC applications, the spike length was significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content, sedimentation and wet gluten ratio increased significantly especially under I2 and I3.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
I2 and I3e0
Outcome
protein content, sedimentation, wet gluten ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content, sedimentation, wet gluten ratio, and gluten index values increased significantly, especially under I2 and I3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gluten index increased significantly especially under I2 and I3.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
I2 and I3e0
Outcome
gluten indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content, sedimentation, wet gluten ratio, and gluten index values increased significantly, especially under I2 and I3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological yield response factors varied between years with CCC application and climate.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
CCC applicationse0
Outcome
biologicale0
Direction
variede0
Value
0.85-0.90 in 2019-2020 and 0.74-0.99 in 2020-2021e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant yield response factors for both biological (0.85-0.90 in 2019-2020 and 0.74-0.99 in 2020-2021) and grain yields (0.77-0.90 in 2019-2020 and 0.77-0.1.12 in 2020-2021) varied between years depending on CCC applications and climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield response factors varied between years with CCC application and climate.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
CCC applicationse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
variede0
Value
0.77-0.90 in 2019-2020 and 0.77-0.1.12 in 2020-2021e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant yield response factors for both biological (0.85-0.90 in 2019-2020 and 0.74-0.99 in 2020-2021) and grain yields (0.77-0.90 in 2019-2020 and 0.77-0.1.12 in 2020-2021) varied between years depending on CCC applications and climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise against foliar CCC for increasing crop yield during drought.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
foliar CCC application for the purpose of increasing crop yield during drought seasone0
Qualifier
might not be recommendablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar CCC application for the purpose of increasing crop yield during drought season might not be recommendable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–130 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

chlormequat chloride · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.