Paper · 2024 · Horticulturae

Effects of Selenate Application on Growth, Nutrient Bioaccumulation, and Bioactive Compounds in Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica L.)

Maria J. Poblaciones; Carlos García-Latorre; Rocio Velazquez; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The biofortification of edible crops with selenium (Se) is a common and effective strategy to address inadequate Se intake, which is suffered by millions of people worldwide. However, there is little information regarding the effects of this practice on crops belonging to the important Brassica family. To evaluate the efficacy of foliar Se application on broccoli, four treatments with varying Se concentrations were tested: 0%, 0.05%, 0.10%, and 0.15% (w/v), applied as sodium selenate during the early flowering stage. Although no overall effects on growth and biomass parameters were observed, the results indicate that the lowest Se dose (0.05-Se) was sufficient to notably increase Se concentration in the florets, even after boiling. Based on the increase to 14.2 mg Se kg−1 of dry matter in this broccoli fraction, it was estimated that consuming a 100-gram portion of boiled florets biofortified with 0.05% Se would provide approximately 140 µg of Se, which could be sufficient to potentially improve human selenium status, as previously documented. Moreover, the results obtained underscore how the application of this small dose was also adequate to reduce phytate concentration in the florets and to increase antioxidant and polyphenol concentrations, thereby improving the concentration and bioavailability of other essential nutrients, including Ca, Mg, Fe, and Zn, along with improving its quality as an antioxidant food.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenate doses showed no overall effects on broccoli growth and biomass.

Treatment
Selenatet0
Outcome
growth and biomass parameterse0
Direction
no overall effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although no overall effects on growth and biomass parameters were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Selenate Application on Growth, Nutrient Bioaccumulation, and Bioactive Compounds in Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.05% Se dose increased floret Se concentration even after boiling.

Treatment
0.05-See0
Outcome
Se concentration in the floretse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest Se dose (0.05-Se) was sufficient to notably increase Se concentration in the florets, even after boiling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofortified broccoli florets reached 14.2 mg Se kg−1 dry matter.

Outcome
See0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14.2 mg Se kg−1 of dry mattere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase to 14.2 mg Se kg−1 of dry matter in this broccoli fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–822 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A 100-gram boiled portion was estimated to provide approximately 140 µg Se.

Outcome
See0
Value
approximately 140 µg of See0
Qualifier
100-gram portion of boiled floretse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“consuming a 100-gram portion of boiled florets biofortified with 0.05% Se would provide approximately 140 µg of Se”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The small dose reduced floret phytate concentration.

Treatment
this small dosee0
Outcome
phytate concentration in the floretse0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of this small dose was also adequate to reduce phytate concentration in the florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The small dose increased floret antioxidant concentration.

Treatment
this small dosee0
Outcome
antioxidante0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of this small dose was also adequate to reduce phytate concentration in the florets and to increase antioxidant and polyphenol concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The small dose increased floret polyphenol concentration.

Treatment
this small dosee0
Outcome
polyphenol concentrationse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of this small dose was also adequate to reduce phytate concentration in the florets and to increase antioxidant and polyphenol concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer improved nutrient concentration and bioavailability, including Ca, Mg, Fe and Zn.

Outcome
concentration and bioavailability of other essential nutrients, including Ca, Mg, Fe, and Zne0
Qualifier
thereby improvinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thereby improving the concentration and bioavailability of other essential nutrients, including Ca, Mg, Fe, and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer improved antioxidant food quality.

Outcome
quality as an antioxidant foode0
Qualifier
improvinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improving its quality as an antioxidant food”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑

selenate · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.