Paper · 2024 · Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

Herbicides and Cereal Rye for Palmer Amaranth Management in Corn and Soybean

Igor G. R. Lima; Alec C. Adam; Wade T. Burris; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Palmer amaranth control is a substantial problem for corn and soybean producers in the United States. Farmers are increasingly interested in cover crops a tool to manage this troublesome weed. Studies were conducted at Rossville, Kansas, in 2023, to assess the most effective combination of herbicides and cereal rye cover crop termination time to control Palmer amaranth in corn and soybean. Treatments that included atrazine + an HPPD-inhibiting herbicide + a VLCFA-inhibiting herbicide plus glyphosate provided the greatest weed control in corn. For soybeans, the combination with the greatest weed control was a PPO-inhibiting herbicide + a VLCFA-inhibiting herbicide + an ALS-inhibiting herbicide plus glyphosate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The atrazine, HPPD inhibitor, VLCFA inhibitor, and glyphosate combination gave the greatest Palmer amaranth control in corn.

Treatment
atrazine + an HPPD-inhibiting herbicide + a VLCFA-inhibiting herbicide plus glyphosatee0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments that included atrazine + an HPPD-inhibiting herbicide + a VLCFA-inhibiting herbicide plus glyphosate provided the greatest weed control in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–547 · show in text ↑
e1

“control Palmer amaranth in corn and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PPO inhibitor, VLCFA inhibitor, ALS inhibitor, and glyphosate combination gave the greatest Palmer amaranth control in soybean.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
a PPO-inhibiting herbicide + a VLCFA-inhibiting herbicide + an ALS-inhibiting herbicide plus glyphosatee0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For soybeans, the combination with the greatest weed control was a PPO-inhibiting herbicide + a VLCFA-inhibiting herbicide + an ALS-inhibiting herbicide plus glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–717 · show in text ↑
e1

“control Palmer amaranth in corn and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–391 · show in text ↑

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 33 positive, 8 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 42 positive, 14 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

herbicide · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

297 papers: 258 positive, 39 negative or no effect

257 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

293 papers more in this group

See all 297 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.