Paper · 2024 · Scientia Horticulturae

Field evaluation and characterization of a novel biostimulant for broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) cultivation under drought and salt stress which increases antioxidant, glucosinolate and phytohormone content

Carlos Montesinos; Patricia Benito; Rosa Porcel; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

• The biostimulant increased the plant antioxidant content under drought stress. • Treated plants presented less oxidative damage under drought stress. • Stress related hormones increased upon biostimulant treatment in salt stress. • The biostimulant induced sodium accumulation in leaves under salt stress. • Treated plants increased the glucosinolate content under salt stress. Anthropogenic global warming is affecting crop yield and thus compromising food security. Drought and salinization of the irrigation water or soil are increasingly frequent in most arable land, specifically in arid and semiarid areas such as the Mediterranean basin. Many crops have been displaced or their yield has plummeted in recent years, causing food shortages and price increases. In a context of global population growth and reduction in the availability of natural resources used in agriculture, finding novel tools that help farmers to maintain yield in an increasingly arid and saline scenario is of pivotal importance. This is particularly important in organic agriculture, where the number of available tools is very limited. Biostimulants are substances or microorganisms of natural origin whose function is to stimulate plant processes related to nutrient absorption, nutrient use efficiency, tolerance to abiotic stress or the quality of the agricultural products obtained. In the present work, we have evaluated, in field, the agronomic effectiveness of a novel biostimulant formulation in a cruciferous crop of great interest in the Mediterranean basin (broccoli) under control conditions, water and salt stress. Our research has shown that our product had a positive effect on broccoli production and in delaying flowering time. We have also found that the application of our biostimulant increased enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense under drought conditions. Similarly, when exposed to salinity, the biostimulant increased the concentration of different phytohormones and glucosinolates. Taken together, our biostimulant increases the tolerance of broccoli to salt stress and water limitation by increasing the antioxidant response, the level of glucosinolates and eliciting the hormonal response.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant treatment increased broccoli production.

Treatment
our producte0
Outcome
broccoli productione0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“our product had a positive effect on broccoli production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant treatment delayed broccoli flowering.

Treatment
our producte0
Outcome
flowering timee0
Direction
delayinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“our product had a positive effect on broccoli production and in delaying flowering time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant application increased enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense under drought.

Treatment
application of our biostimulante0
Outcome
enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defensee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under drought conditionse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the application of our biostimulant increased enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant treatment increased phytohormone concentrations under salinity.

Treatment
the biostimulante0
Outcome
concentration of different phytohormonese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
exposed to salinitye0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when exposed to salinity, the biostimulant increased the concentration of different phytohormones and glucosinolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–1999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant treatment increased glucosinolate concentrations under salinity.

Treatment
the biostimulante0
Outcome
glucosinolatese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
exposed to salinitye0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when exposed to salinity, the biostimulant increased the concentration of different phytohormones and glucosinolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–1999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant treatment reduced oxidative damage under drought.

Treatment
Treatede0
Outcome
oxidative damagee0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
under drought stresse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treated plants presented less oxidative damage under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant treatment induced leaf sodium accumulation under salt stress.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
The biostimulante0
Outcome
sodium accumulatione0
Direction
inducede0
Qualifier
under salt stresse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The biostimulant induced sodium accumulation in leaves under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–307 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the biostimulant increases broccoli tolerance to salt and water limitation.

Treatment
our biostimulante0
Outcome
tolerance of broccoli to salt stress and water limitatione0
Direction
increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“our biostimulant increases the tolerance of broccoli to salt stress and water limitation by increasing the antioxidant response, the level of glucosinolates and eliciting the hormonal response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2209 · show in text ↑

other · physiology: enzyme activity · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

other · physiology: hormones · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.