Paper · 2024 · Revista Caatinga

Effects of Fe and Zn on growth, biofortification and quality of lettuce grown in hydroponics

Vitor B. da Silva; Laura M. Ribera; Maria J. Y. Medelo; et al.

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) are essential elements for human health and their deficiencies cause reduced work capacity, physiological and immune system disorders, anemia and even death, being considered primary global public health problems. Agronomic biofortification aims to increase the concentration of these nutrients in the edible part of the plant and, consequently, increase human intake of these nutrients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Fe and Zn concentrations on the growth, biofortification and quality of lettuce grown in hydroponics. Six treatments corresponding to the combinations of Zn (0.06 and 0.24 mg L-1) and Fe (2, 4 and 8 mg L-1) concentrations were evaluated. Increase of Zn in the nutrient solution positively influenced only leaf Zn contents at 18 days after transplanting the seedlings and ascorbic acid at harvest. On the other hand, the increase in Fe concentration positively influenced the contents of photosynthetic pigments, ascorbic acid and Fe; however, it negatively affected the leaf Zn content, leaf area and leaf dry mass of lettuce. Greater biofortification of lettuce for Fe was observed with the Fe concentration of 8 mg L-1 in the solution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Zn raised leaf Zn content at 18 days.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Increase of Zn in the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
leaf Zn contentse0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase of Zn in the nutrient solution positively influenced only leaf Zn contents at 18 days after transplanting the seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Fe lowered leaf Zn content, leaf area and dry mass.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
increase in Fe concentratione0
Outcome
leaf Zn content, leaf area and leaf dry masse0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in Fe concentration positively influenced the contents of photosynthetic pigments, ascorbic acid and Fe; however, it negatively affected the leaf Zn content, leaf area and leaf dry mass of lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1099 · show in text ↑

iron atom · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

137 papers: 112 positive, 25 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.