Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Potential Impact of Drought and Rewatering on Plant Physiology and Fruit Quality in Long-Shelf-Life Tomatoes

Cristina Patanè; Sarah Siah; Valeria Cafaro; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, the effects of repeated cycles of drying and rehydration on some physiological traits were assessed in long shelf-life tomatoes cultivated in a typical semi-arid area of Southern Italy. Three Sicilian landraces (‘Custonaci’, ‘Salina’, and ‘Vulcano’) from the germplasm collection at CNR-IBE (Catania, Italy) and a commercial tomato mini-plum (‘Faino Hy., control) were investigated under three water regimes: DRY (no irrigation), IRR (long-season full irrigation) and REW (post-drought rewaterings). Net photosynthetic assimilation rate (Pn), leaf transpiration (E), stomatal conductance (gs), instantaneous water use efficiency (WUEi), leaf intercellular CO2 (Ci, ppm), and leaf temperature (°C), were measured during the growing season. At harvest (late July), fruit production per plant was measured and ripened fruits were analysed for total solids (TS), soluble solids (SS), reducing sugars (RS), vitamin C (AscA), and total phenols (TP). Pn promptly responded to rewatering (REW), quickly increasing immediately after irrigation, and declined with soil drying up. All genotypes had similar physiological pathways in DRY, but in IRR, ‘Faino’ had higher Pn (up to 31 μmol CO2 m−2s−1) and E (up to 18 mmol H2O m−2s−1). Stomatal conductance (gs) after rewatering steeply increased and quickly declined after that. All local landraces had the same gs in IRR and REW. Variations in RWC were less pronounced than those in other physiological parameters. WUEi in REW and DRY proceeded similarly (up to 3 μmol CO2 mmol H2O). Irrigation in REW significantly promoted plant productivity over the DRY control (up to +150% in ‘Vulcano’). TS and SS in REW were lower than those in DRY, but higher (+19 and +7%, respectively) than in IRR. Vitamin C was greater in DRY and REW (26 and 18% higher than in IRR, respectively). TP in all local tomatoes were significantly higher (up to +29% in ‘Vulcano’) than those in the commercial control. Water regime had a minor effect on TP in ‘Custonaci’ and ‘Salina’. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) provided information on the changes in physiological and fruit quality traits in tomatoes in relation to cultivars and water regimes. The results of this study also revealed that a water-saving irrigation strategy where few irrigations are applied after prolonged periods of drought might be profitable in terms of fruit production enhancement in long shelf-life tomatoes and that limited rewaterings in most cases, help retaining high levels of fruit quality traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering raised tomato photosynthetic assimilation, which declined as soil dried.

Treatment
rewatering (REW)e0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
soil drying upe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pn promptly responded to rewatering (REW), quickly increasing immediately after irrigation, and declined with soil drying up.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under full irrigation Faino had higher photosynthetic assimilation, reaching 31 μmol CO2 m−2s−1.

Material
Fainoe0
Treatment
IRRe0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
highere0
Value
31 μmol CO2 m−2s−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in IRR, ‘Faino’ had higher Pn (up to 31 μmol CO2 m−2s−1) and E (up to 18 mmol H2O m−2s−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under full irrigation Faino had higher leaf transpiration, reaching 18 mmol H2O m−2s−1.

Material
Fainoe0
Treatment
IRRe0
Outcome
Ee0
Direction
highere0
Value
18 mmol H2O m−2s−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in IRR, ‘Faino’ had higher Pn (up to 31 μmol CO2 m−2s−1) and E (up to 18 mmol H2O m−2s−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato stomatal conductance rose after rewatering and then quickly declined.

Treatment
rewateringe0
Outcome
Stomatal conductance (gs)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance (gs) after rewatering steeply increased and quickly declined after that.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local tomato landraces had the same stomatal conductance in full irrigation and rewatering regimes.

Material
local landracese0
Outcome
gse0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
IRR and REWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All local landraces had the same gs in IRR and REW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content varied less than other tomato physiological parameters.

Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
less pronouncede0
Comparator
other physiological parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variations in RWC were less pronounced than those in other physiological parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato water use efficiency was similar under rewatering and dry regimes, reaching 3 μmol CO2 mmol H2O.

Outcome
WUEie0
Direction
similarlye0
Value
3 μmol CO2 mmol H2Oe0
Comparator
REW and DRYe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUEi in REW and DRY proceeded similarly (up to 3 μmol CO2 mmol H2O).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering significantly improved tomato productivity over the dry control, by as much as 150% in Vulcano.

Material
Vulcanoe0
Treatment
REWe0
Outcome
plant productivitye0
Direction
promotede0
Value
+150%e0
Comparator
DRY controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation in REW significantly promoted plant productivity over the DRY control (up to +150% in ‘Vulcano’).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering lowered tomato total solids relative to dry conditions but raised them 19% relative to full irrigation.

Treatment
REWe0
Outcome
TSe0
Direction
highere0
Value
+19e0
Comparator
IRRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TS and SS in REW were lower than those in DRY, but higher (+19 and +7%, respectively) than in IRR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1744 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering lowered tomato soluble solids relative to dry conditions but raised them 7% relative to full irrigation.

Treatment
REWe0
Outcome
SSe0
Direction
highere0
Value
+7%e0
Comparator
IRRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TS and SS in REW were lower than those in DRY, but higher (+19 and +7%, respectively) than in IRR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1744 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C was 26% higher under dry conditions than full irrigation.

Treatment
DRYe0
Outcome
Vitamin Ce0
Direction
greatere0
Value
26e0
Comparator
IRRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitamin C was greater in DRY and REW (26 and 18% higher than in IRR, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C was 18% higher under rewatering than full irrigation.

Treatment
REWe0
Outcome
Vitamin Ce0
Direction
highere0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
IRRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vitamin C was greater in DRY and REW (26 and 18% higher than in IRR, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Local tomatoes had significantly more total phenols than the commercial control, up to 29% more in Vulcano.

Material
Vulcanoe0
Outcome
TPe0
Direction
highere0
Value
+29%e0
Comparator
commercial controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TP in all local tomatoes were significantly higher (up to +29% in ‘Vulcano’) than those in the commercial control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–1943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water regime had little influence on phenols in Custonaci and Salina.

Treatment
Water regimee0
Outcome
TPe0
Direction
minor effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water regime had a minor effect on TP in ‘Custonaci’ and ‘Salina’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1944–2010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest limited post-drought irrigation can improve long shelf-life tomato fruit production while retaining quality.

Outcome
few irrigations are applied after prolonged periods of droughte0
Qualifier
might be profitablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a water-saving irrigation strategy where few irrigations are applied after prolonged periods of drought might be profitable in terms of fruit production enhancement in long shelf-life tomatoes and that limited rewaterings in most cases, help retaining high levels of fruit quality traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2225–2513 · show in text ↑

rewatering · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

rewatering · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.