Paper · 2024 · Horticulturae

Physio-Morphological Traits Contributing to Genotypic Differences in Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Leafy Vegetable Species under Low N Stress

Firdes Ulas; Yusuf Cem Yücel; Abdullah Ulas

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil fertility is declining in low-input agriculture due to insufficient fertilizer application by small-scale farmers. On the other hand, concerns are rising regarding the environmental pollution of both air and water in high-input agriculture due to the excessive use of N fertilizers in short growing seasons for vegetable crops, which is directly linked to the health of human beings and environmental safety. This study aimed to determine genotypic differences in the Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) levels of different leafy vegetable species (Arugula, Spinach, Cress, Parsley, and Dill) grown hydroponically under two different N rates, low N (0.3 mM) and high N (3.0 mM), and to identify the plant traits that are contributing to NUE. A nutrient solution experiment was conducted between March and April 2024 by using an aerated Deep-Water Culture (DWC) technique in a fully automated climate room with a completely randomized block design (CRBD) with three replications for five weeks. The results indicated that shoot growth, as well as root morphological and leaf physiological responses, was significantly (p < 0.001) affected by genotype, the N rate, and genotype–N rate interactions. Shoot growth in some vegetable species (Arugula, Spinach, and Cress) was significantly higher under a low N than a high N rate, illustrating that they have a great capability for NUE under low N stress conditions. Similar results were also recorded for the root growth of the N-efficient species under low N rates. The NUE levels of these species were closely associated with leaf physiological (leaf area, leaf chlorophyll index (SPAD), photosynthesis, and total leaf chlorophyll (a + b) and carotenoids) and root morphological (root length, root volume, and average root diameter) characteristics. These plant traits could be useful indicators for the selection and breeding of ‘N-efficient’ leafy vegetable species for sustainable low-input agriculture systems in the future. However, further investigation should be carried out at the field level to confirm their commercial production viability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot growth varied significantly with genotype, N rate and their interaction.

Taxon
leafy vegetable speciese0t0
Material
genotypee0t0
Treatment
N ratee0t0
Outcome
shoot growthe0t0
Value
p < 0.001e0t0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“shoot growth, as well as root morphological and leaf physiological responses, was significantly (p < 0.001) affected by genotype, the N rate, and genotype–N rate interactions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leafy Vegetable Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–119 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root morphology varied significantly with genotype, N rate and their interaction.

Taxon
leafy vegetable speciese0t0
Material
genotypee0t0
Treatment
N ratee0t0
Outcome
root morphologicale0t0
Value
p < 0.001e0t0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“root morphological and leaf physiological responses, was significantly (p < 0.001) affected by genotype, the N rate, and genotype–N rate interactions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leafy Vegetable Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–119 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf physiology varied significantly with genotype, N rate and their interaction.

Taxon
leafy vegetable speciese0t0
Material
genotypee0t0
Treatment
N ratee0t0
Outcome
leaf physiological responsese0t0
Value
p < 0.001e0t0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“leaf physiological responses, was significantly (p < 0.001) affected by genotype, the N rate, and genotype–N rate interactions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leafy Vegetable Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Arugula shoot growth was higher at low than high N.

Treatment
low Ne0
Outcome
Shoot growthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
high N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot growth in some vegetable species (Arugula, Spinach, and Cress) was significantly higher under a low N than a high N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach shoot growth was higher at low than high N.

Treatment
low Ne0
Outcome
Shoot growthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
high N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot growth in some vegetable species (Arugula, Spinach, and Cress) was significantly higher under a low N than a high N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cress shoot growth was higher at low than high N.

Taxon
Cresse0
Treatment
low Ne0
Outcome
Shoot growthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
high N ratee0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot growth in some vegetable species (Arugula, Spinach, and Cress) was significantly higher under a low N than a high N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-efficient species had similar root growth responses at low N rates.

Taxon
N-efficient speciese0
Treatment
low N ratese0
Outcome
root growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were also recorded for the root growth of the N-efficient species under low N rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1510 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUE was closely associated with leaf area, SPAD and photosynthesis.

Taxon
these speciese0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
NUE levelse0
Qualifier
leaf area, leaf chlorophyll index (SPAD), photosynthesise0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The NUE levels of these species were closely associated with leaf physiological (leaf area, leaf chlorophyll index (SPAD), photosynthesis, and total leaf chlorophyll (a + b) and carotenoids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1701 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUE was closely associated with leaf chlorophyll and carotenoids.

Taxon
these speciese0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
NUE levelse0
Qualifier
total leaf chlorophyll (a + b) and carotenoidse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The NUE levels of these species were closely associated with leaf physiological (leaf area, leaf chlorophyll index (SPAD), photosynthesis, and total leaf chlorophyll (a + b) and carotenoids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1701 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUE was closely associated with root length, volume and diameter.

Taxon
these speciese0
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
NUE levelse0
Qualifier
root length, root volume, and average root diametere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The NUE levels of these species were closely associated with leaf physiological (leaf area, leaf chlorophyll index (SPAD), photosynthesis, and total leaf chlorophyll (a + b) and carotenoids) and root morphological (root length, root volume, and average root diameter) characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1795 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose these traits as indicators for selecting N-efficient leafy vegetables.

Taxon
leafy vegetable speciese0
Outcome
useful indicators for the selection and breeding of ‘N-efficient’ leafy vegetable speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“These plant traits could be useful indicators for the selection and breeding of ‘N-efficient’ leafy vegetable species for sustainable low-input agriculture systems in the future.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1974 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Eruca vesicariaPositive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 28 positive, 12 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.