Paper · 2024 · Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental

Evaluation of the adsorption potential of iron mining tailing and its effect on raphanus sativus germination

Ricardo da Silva Antunes Martins; Matheus Rodrigues Moraes da Silva; Marco Antonio dos Santos Lourenço; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of this work was to evaluate the physicochemical and adsorptive characterization of Fe tailing collected in the district of Brumadinho; and verify its effect on Raphanus sativus germination. The material was collected on the surface layer (0-20 cm) and disintegrated for pH, redox potential – Eh, electrical conductivity – EC, OM, cation exchange capacity – CEC, specific surface area – SSA and functional groups characterization. Adsorption studies were conducted using methylene blue (MB). The results of the adsorption studies were analyzed using kinetic models (Elovich, pseudo-first order – PFO and pseudo-second order – PSO) and isotherm models (Freundlich, Langmuir and Sips). The tailing has an acidic pH (5.60), negative ΔpH (-0.30) and low CEC (1.85 cmolc g-1). A high MB adsorption efficiency (96%) was verified. The Elovich model (0.9248<R2<0.9858) best represented the chemical kinetics, and the Freundlich model best describes the MB adsorption process in the tailing (R2 = 0.9609). The maximum adsorption capacity (qm) was equal to 15.08 mg g-1. The presence of Fe tailing positively influenced the germination of R. sativus seeds (73.8%), but stem and root growth were inferior when compared to seedlings cultivated in compost substrate. It is concluded that the material has favorable cationic adsorption capacity, which can benefit soil fertilization. However, R. sativus development was minor in Fe tailing substrate, probably due to low CEC, OM and nutrient availability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Fe tailing has an acidic pH of 5.60.

Outcome
pHe2
Value
5.60e2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e2

“The tailing has an acidic pH (5.60)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–742 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Fe tailing has a negative pH change (delta pH) of -0.30.

Outcome
ΔpHe3
Value
-0.30e3

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e3

“negative ΔpH (-0.30)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–764 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Fe tailing has a low cation exchange capacity of 1.85 cmolc g-1.

Outcome
CECe4
Value
1.85 cmolc g-1e4
Qualifier
lowe4

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e4

“low CEC (1.85 cmolc g-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–793 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Fe tailing showed a high methylene blue adsorption efficiency of 96%.

Outcome
MB adsorption efficiencye5
Value
96%e5
Qualifier
highe5

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e5

“A high MB adsorption efficiency (96%) was verified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–845 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Elovich kinetic model best represented the chemical kinetics of methylene blue adsorption on the tailing (0.9248<R2<0.9858).

Outcome
chemical kineticse6
Value
0.9248<R2<0.9858e6

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e6

“The Elovich model (0.9248<R2<0.9858) best represented the chemical kinetics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–922 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Freundlich isotherm model best described the methylene blue adsorption in the tailing (R2 = 0.9609).

Outcome
MB adsorption process in the tailinge7
Value
R2 = 0.9609e7

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e7

“the Freundlich model best describes the MB adsorption process in the tailing (R2 = 0.9609)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1018 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum adsorption capacity of the tailing was 15.08 mg g-1.

Outcome
maximum adsorption capacity (qm)e1
Value
15.08 mg g-1e1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“The maximum adsorption capacity (qm) was equal to 15.08 mg g-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1082 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of Fe tailing positively influenced Raphanus sativus seed germination (73.8%).

Taxon
Raphanus sativusRaphanus sativuse0
Treatment
presence of Fe tailinge1
Outcome
germination of R. sativus seedse1
Direction
positively influencede1
Value
73.8%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“verify its effect on Raphanus sativus germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“The presence of Fe tailing positively influenced the germination of R. sativus seeds (73.8%), but stem and root growth were inferior when compared to seedlings cultivated in compost substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem and root growth of Raphanus sativus seedlings in Fe tailing were inferior to seedlings cultivated in compost substrate.

Taxon
Raphanus sativusRaphanus sativuse0
Treatment
presence of Fe tailinge1
Outcome
stem and root growthe1
Direction
inferiore1
Comparator
seedlings cultivated in compost substratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“verify its effect on Raphanus sativus germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“The presence of Fe tailing positively influenced the germination of R. sativus seeds (73.8%), but stem and root growth were inferior when compared to seedlings cultivated in compost substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1275 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low CEC, organic matter and nutrient availability probably explain the minor development of R. sativus in Fe tailing substrate.

Taxon
R. sativusRaphanus sativuse1
Treatment
Fe tailing substratee1
Outcome
developmente1
Qualifier
probably due to low CEC, OM and nutrient availabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“However, R. sativus development was minor in Fe tailing substrate, probably due to low CEC, OM and nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1513 · show in text ↑

iron atom · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.