Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Optimizing rice (Oryza sativa) growth, productivity, profitability and nutrient uptake with coated urea and organic manure in the new alluvial zone of West Bengal

SUSMITA DAS; SUKANTA PAL; HIRAK BANERJEE; et al.

17
claims
48
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A two-year field experiment was carried out at experimental farm of BCKV, Nadia, West Bengal during kharif seasons of 2019–20 and 2020–21 to study the effect of combined application of coated urea and organic manure on performance of rice. The experiment was laid-out in a randomized complete block design with four replications and treatment comprised 5 treatment combinations, such as T1 , control plot (without N); T2 , 100% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through neem-coated urea (NCU); T3 , 75% RDN through NCU + 25% RDN through FYM (farm yard manure); T4, 100% RDN through polymer sulphur coated urea (PSCU); T5, 75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM. The results showed that 75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted in maximum growth attributes, viz. plant height (110.8 cm), maximum number of effective tillers per square meter (416/m2 ), highest dry-matter accumulation (DMA) (740 g/m2 ), leaf area index (LAI) (4.47) and crop growth rate (CGR) (6.56 g/m2 /day), highest yield components like panicle length (23.5 cm), panicle weight (9.95 g), num- ber of filled grains/panicle (113), test-weight (21.3 g) and maximum grain yield (4.79 t/ha) and straw yield (5.53 t/ ha). Similarly, maximum amount of total nutrient uptake by crop (99.7, 40.1 and 208 kg/ha NPK), protein yield (418 kg/ha), gross returns (` 71.8 × 103 /ha), net return (` 52 × 103 /ha) and B: C ratio (2.73) were noticed under T5 treat- ment. Therefore, it is advisable to implement a comprehensive nutrient management strategy T5 (75% RDN through PSCU + 25% RDN through FYM) in rice cultivation. This approach enhances growth, yield, nutrient absorption, and quality, ultimately boosting agricultural productivity, profitability, and sustainability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T5 nutrient treatment maximized rice plant height at 110.8 cm.

Treatment
75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYMe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
110.8 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted in maximum growth attributes, viz. plant height (110.8 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 maximized effective tillers at 416/m2.

Treatment
75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYMe1
Outcome
number of effective tillers per square metere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
416/m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum number of effective tillers per square meter (416/m2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 maximized dry-matter accumulation at 740 g/m2.

Treatment
75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYMe1
Outcome
dry-matter accumulatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
740 g/m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest dry-matter accumulation (DMA) (740 g/m2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–914 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 maximized leaf area index at 4.47.

Treatment
75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYMe1
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Value
4.47e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area index (LAI) (4.47)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 maximized crop growth rate at 6.56 g/m2 /day.

Treatment
75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYMe1
Outcome
crop growth ratee0
Value
6.56 g/m2 /daye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop growth rate (CGR) (6.56 g/m2 /day)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave a panicle length of 23.5 cm among the highest yield components.

Treatment
75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYMe1
Outcome
panicle lengthe0
Value
23.5 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“panicle length (23.5 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave panicle weight of 9.95 g among the highest yield components.

Treatment
75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYMe1
Outcome
panicle weighte0
Value
9.95 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“panicle weight (9.95 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave 113 filled grains per panicle among the highest yield components.

Treatment
75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYMe1
Outcome
num- ber of filled grains/paniclee0
Value
113e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“num- ber of filled grains/panicle (113)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1110 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave test-weight of 21.3 g among the highest yield components.

Treatment
75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYMe1
Outcome
test-weighte0
Value
21.3 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“test-weight (21.3 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1132 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 maximized grain yield at 4.79 t/ha.

Treatment
75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYMe1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.79 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum grain yield (4.79 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1168 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave straw yield of 5.53 t/ ha.

Treatment
75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYMe1
Outcome
straw yielde0
Value
5.53 t/ hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield (5.53 t/ ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1197 · show in text ↑
e1

“75% RDN through PSCU+25% RDN through FYM re- sulted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave maximum total nutrient uptake of 99.7, 40.1 and 208 kg/ha NPK.

Treatment
T5e1
Outcome
total nutrient uptake by crope0
Direction
maximume0
Value
99.7, 40.1 and 208 kg/ha NPKe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum amount of total nutrient uptake by crop (99.7, 40.1 and 208 kg/ha NPK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“under T5 treat- ment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave protein yield of 418 kg/ha.

Treatment
T5e1
Outcome
protein yielde0
Value
418 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein yield (418 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1315 · show in text ↑
e1

“under T5 treat- ment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave gross returns of 71.8 × 103 /ha.

Treatment
T5e1
Outcome
gross returnse0
Value
71.8 × 103 /hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gross returns (` 71.8 × 103 /ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1349 · show in text ↑
e1

“under T5 treat- ment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave net return of 52 × 103 /ha.

Treatment
T5e1
Outcome
net returne0
Value
52 × 103 /hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net return (` 52 × 103 /ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1378 · show in text ↑
e1

“under T5 treat- ment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave a B: C ratio of 2.73.

Treatment
T5e1
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Value
2.73e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B: C ratio (2.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1400 · show in text ↑
e1

“under T5 treat- ment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–30 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend T5 for rice cultivation.

Outcome
implement a comprehensive nutrient management strategy T5 (75% RDN through PSCU + 25% RDN through FYM)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is advisable to implement a comprehensive nutrient management strategy T5 (75% RDN through PSCU + 25% RDN through FYM) in rice cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1589 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

51 papers: 47 positive, 4 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

148 papers: 129 positive, 19 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.