Paper · 2024 · Plant Nano Biology

Elucidation of biochemical and physiological modulations in Triticum aestivum induced by green synthesized nitrogen-enriched zinc nano-complexes

Zari Shiran; Sedigheh Esmaeilzadeh Bahabadi; Zohreh Razmara; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

This study investigates the efficacy of a green synthesized nitrogen-rich zinc complex (Zn-NC) using quinoline (C 9 H 7 N) as the nitrogen-rich substrate to enhance growth and biochemical properties in wheat ( Triticum aestivum ). The performance of Zn-NC was compared to standard zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs). Both Zn-NC and ZnO-NPs were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD), and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Three concentrations (100, 200, and 500 ppm) of each compound, along with a control, were applied to local soil samples (n=3). The physiological (biomass, elongation) and biochemical effects (chlorophyll, carotenoids, flavonoids, and phenols) on wheat were investigated. Potential phytotoxic effects were evaluated to establish the biostimulants' safety thresholds. Plants treated with green Zn-NC showed an average increase in shoot length of 25 % compared to the control group. The chlorophyll content in plants treated with ZnO-NPs increased by 18 %, while those treated with green Zn-NC increased by 12 % compared to control. Application of ZnO-NPs resulted in a 30 % increase in total yield, whereas green Zn-NC treatment led to a 22 % yield increase. The root biomass of plants treated with ZnO-NPs increased by 28 %, and those treated with green Zn-NC saw a 20 % increase compared to controls. Based on the optimization of overall results, the ZnO NPs showed phytotoxic effects at concentrations above 200 ppm, while green Zn-NC exhibited no significant phytotoxicity even at concentrations up to 300 ppm. This study delineates the optimal concentrations of Zn-NC and ZnO-NPs that can enhance nutrient delivery and yield in cereal crops while mitigating phytotoxic risks. The findings provide valuable insights into applying nano-biostimulants in agroecosystems, highlighting their potential to improve productivity and sustainability in agriculture. • Zn-NC and ZnO-NPs significantly enhanced the growth and biochemical properties of wheat. • Zn-NC offers an eco-friendly alternative for nitrogen-deficient soils. • Detailed characterization and safety thresholds ensure safe agricultural use. • Determined effective concentrations of Zn-NC and ZnO-NPs for boosting crop yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green Zn-NC raised wheat shoot length by 25 % against control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
green Zn-NCe0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
25 %e0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants treated with green Zn-NC showed an average increase in shoot length of 25 % compared to the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO-NPs raised wheat chlorophyll content by 18 %.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnO-NPse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content in plants treated with ZnO-NPs increased by 18 %, while those treated with green Zn-NC increased by 12 % compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green Zn-NC raised wheat chlorophyll content by 12 %.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
green Zn-NCe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content in plants treated with ZnO-NPs increased by 18 %, while those treated with green Zn-NC increased by 12 % compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO-NPs increased wheat yield by 30 %.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnO-NPse0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
30 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of ZnO-NPs resulted in a 30 % increase in total yield, whereas green Zn-NC treatment led to a 22 % yield increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green Zn-NC increased wheat yield by 22 %.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
green Zn-NCe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
22 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of ZnO-NPs resulted in a 30 % increase in total yield, whereas green Zn-NC treatment led to a 22 % yield increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO-NPs increased wheat root biomass by 28 %.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnO-NPse0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28 %e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root biomass of plants treated with ZnO-NPs increased by 28 %, and those treated with green Zn-NC saw a 20 % increase compared to controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green Zn-NC increased wheat root biomass by 20 %.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
green Zn-NCe0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20 %e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root biomass of plants treated with ZnO-NPs increased by 28 %, and those treated with green Zn-NC saw a 20 % increase compared to controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs showed phytotoxicity above 200 ppm.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnO NPse0
Outcome
phytotoxic effectse0
Value
200 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ZnO NPs showed phytotoxic effects at concentrations above 200 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green Zn-NC showed no significant phytotoxicity up to 300 ppm.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
green Zn-NCe0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Value
300 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green Zn-NC exhibited no significant phytotoxicity even at concentrations up to 300 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc oxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

33 papers: 29 positive, 4 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

zinc oxide nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

zinc oxide nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc oxide · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.