Paper · 2024 · Journal of Krishi Vigyan

Effect of shoot pruning and growth regulators on yield, quality and marketability of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) Cv. Allison

Kamal Kumar Pande; Harish Chandra Joshi; Raj Kumar

7
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An study was conducted by KVK, Bageshwar during 2021 at Sama village of Kapkot block of district Bageshwar to find out the suitability and efficacy of different crop regulating options of kiwifruit in farmer’s perspective. The prime purpose of the study was to increase the yield of A grade fruits to maximize the returns. Four treatments (T1- No pinching and no use of plant growth regulators, T2- Pinching 20 percent growth at petal fall that continued till harvest at one month interval, T3- T2 + Fruit dipping at 20 days after full bloom in 50 ppm GA3 solution for 5 second,T4- T2 + Fruit dipping at 20 Days After Full Bloom in 50 ppm 2,4 D solution for 5 second) were applied for the assessment of various technologies. Pinching of 20 percent shoot growth at petal fall stage that continued till harvest at one month interval was found most appropriate. This practice gave 24 kg A grade fruits (>70 g) per vine, 17 kg B grade fruits (50-70 g) per vine and 7 kg C grade fruits (<50 g) per vine, while the farmer’s practice (no pinching) resulted in 6 kg Agrade fruits (>70 g) per vine, 13 kg B grade fruits (50-70 g) per vine and 21 kg C grade fruits (<50 g) per vine. The total soluble solid content (TSS°B) of fruits from pinching treatment was also higher (16.10 °B) than the fruits from no pinching vines (14.95 °B). Use of GA 3 (50 ppm) and 2,4 D (20 ppm) as fruit dip method at 20 days after full bloom (20 DAFB) could not further increase the grade A and B fruit yield significantly over pinching alone. Thus, Pinching of 20 percent shoot growth at petal fall stage that continued till harvest at one month interval is recommended for obtaining maximum quantity of “A” grade fruits that will successfully compete in market for better price.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching gave 24 kg A grade fruit per vine versus 6 kg without pinching.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
Pinching of 20 percent shoot growth at petal fall stage that continued till harvest at one month intervale2
Outcome
A grade fruitse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
24 kge0
Qualifier
6 kge1
Comparator
farmer’s practice (no pinching)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This practice gave 24 kg A grade fruits (>70 g) per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–915 · show in text ↑
e1

“farmer’s practice (no pinching) resulted in 6 kg Agrade fruits (>70 g) per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1088 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pinching of 20 percent shoot growth at petal fall stage that continued till harvest at one month interval was found most appropriate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching gave 17 kg B grade fruit per vine versus 13 kg without pinching.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
Pinching of 20 percent shoot growth at petal fall stage that continued till harvest at one month intervale3
Outcome
B grade fruitse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
17 kge0
Qualifier
13 kge1
Comparator
farmer’s practice (no pinching)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“17 kg B grade fruits (50-70 g) per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–956 · show in text ↑
e1

“13 kg B grade fruits (50-70 g) per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1129 · show in text ↑
e2

“farmer’s practice (no pinching)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1040 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pinching of 20 percent shoot growth at petal fall stage that continued till harvest at one month interval was found most appropriate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinching gave 7 kg C grade fruit per vine versus 21 kg without pinching.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
Pinching of 20 percent shoot growth at petal fall stage that continued till harvest at one month intervale3
Outcome
C grade fruitse0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
7 kge0
Qualifier
21 kge1
Comparator
farmer’s practice (no pinching)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“7 kg C grade fruits (<50 g) per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–997 · show in text ↑
e1

“21 kg C grade fruits (<50 g) per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1171 · show in text ↑
e2

“farmer’s practice (no pinching)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1040 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pinching of 20 percent shoot growth at petal fall stage that continued till harvest at one month interval was found most appropriate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinched vines had higher fruit soluble solids, 16.10 °B versus 14.95 °B.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
pinching treatmente0
Outcome
total soluble solid content (TSS°B)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.10 °Be0
Qualifier
14.95 °Be0
Comparator
no pinching vinese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total soluble solid content (TSS°B) of fruits from pinching treatment was also higher (16.10 °B) than the fruits from no pinching vines (14.95 °B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 fruit dipping did not significantly increase A and B grade yields beyond pinching.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
GA 3 (50 ppm)e0
Outcome
grade A and B fruit yielde0
Direction
could not further increasee0
Comparator
pinching alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of GA 3 (50 ppm) and 2,4 D (20 ppm) as fruit dip method at 20 days after full bloom (20 DAFB) could not further increase the grade A and B fruit yield significantly over pinching alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4 D fruit dipping did not significantly increase A and B grade yields beyond pinching.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
2,4 D (20 ppm)e0
Outcome
grade A and B fruit yielde0
Direction
could not further increasee0
Comparator
pinching alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of GA 3 (50 ppm) and 2,4 D (20 ppm) as fruit dip method at 20 days after full bloom (20 DAFB) could not further increase the grade A and B fruit yield significantly over pinching alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend repeated 20 percent shoot pinching to maximize A grade fruit for sale.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
Pinching of 20 percent shoot growth at petal fall stage that continued till harvest at one month intervale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinching of 20 percent shoot growth at petal fall stage that continued till harvest at one month interval is recommended for obtaining maximum quantity of “A” grade fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results differ

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.