Paper · 2011 · Acta Horticulturae

INFLUENCE OF CPPU ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH OTHER PLANT BIO-REGULATORS ON FRUIT YIELD, QUALITY AND HARVEST MATURITY OF 'ALLISON' KIWIFRUIT

V.S. Rana; V. Bhardwaj; N. Rana

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The investigations were conducted on 23-year-old 'Allison' kiwifruit vines having uniform growth and vigour. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with ten treatments, comprising of CPPU alone and in combination with GA3 and 2,4-D. The fruits were dipped in these bio-regulators at 2 and 3 weeks after full bloom. Highest fruit yields were achieved with application of 5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-D and the lowest fruit yields resulted when fruit were not treated. This treatment also produced the maximum yield of 'A' (>80 g) and 'B' (50-80 g) grade fruit and minimum 'C' (<50 g) grade fruits at both dipping times. Fruit weight and size were also highest with this treatment. Highest total soluble solids (TSS), total sugars and sugar:acid ratios were obtained with this treatment at 2 weeks after full bloom and minimum were recorded in untreated vines. The effect of treatments and harvesting date on the quality parameters exhibited increase of TSS up to the fifth harvest. Titratable acidity declined rapidly up to the fourth harvest and then more slowly. After storage, this treatment also recorded higher TSS and lower titratable acidity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined regulators gave the highest fruit yields.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-De0
Outcome
fruit yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Comparator
fruit were not treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest fruit yields were achieved with application of 5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-D and the lowest fruit yields resulted when fruit were not treated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–490 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
t1

“5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination maximized A and B grade fruit yields.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-Dt1
Outcome
yield of 'A' (>80 g) and 'B' (50-80 g) grade fruite0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also produced the maximum yield of 'A' (>80 g) and 'B' (50-80 g) grade fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–582 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
t1

“5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination minimized C grade fruit.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-Dt1
Outcome
'C' (<50 g) grade fruitse0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum 'C' (<50 g) grade fruits at both dipping times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
t1

“5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination maximized fruit weight and size.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-Dt1
Outcome
Fruit weight and sizee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit weight and size were also highest with this treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
t1

“5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination gave highest soluble solids, sugars and sugar acid ratios two weeks after bloom.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-Dt1
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS), total sugars and sugar:acid ratiose0
Direction
Higheste0
Qualifier
2 weeks after full bloome0
Comparator
untreated vinese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest total soluble solids (TSS), total sugars and sugar:acid ratios were obtained with this treatment at 2 weeks after full bloom and minimum were recorded in untreated vines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
t1

“5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS increased up to the fifth harvest.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
up to the fifth harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase of TSS up to the fifth harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
t1

“5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity declined rapidly to fourth harvest then more slowly.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
Titratable aciditye0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
up to the fourth harvest and then more slowlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Titratable acidity declined rapidly up to the fourth harvest and then more slowly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
t1

“5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After storage, combination treated fruit had higher TSS.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-Dt1
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
After storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After storage, this treatment also recorded higher TSS and lower titratable acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
t1

“5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After storage, combination treated fruit had lower acidity.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-Dt1
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
After storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After storage, this treatment also recorded higher TSS and lower titratable acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 133–142 · show in text ↑
t1

“5 ppm CPPU + 60 ppm GA3 + 15 ppm 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results differ

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

forchlorfenuron · quality: sugar starch · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results differ

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

2,4-D · quality: sugar starch · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

forchlorfenuron · yield · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.