Paper · 2015 · PubMed

Effect of summer pruning and CPPU on yield and quality of kiwi fruit (Actinidia deliciosa).

K K Pramanick; Poonam Kashyap; D K Kishore; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
19
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on bearing vines of kiwifruit cv. Abbott to find the effect of CPPU (N-(2- chloro-4-pyridyl)-N-phenylurea) and summer pruning on fruit yield, fruit size and quality. CPPU greatly stimulated fruit growth indicating that it can be a powerful tool for improving kiwifruit cropping. Application of CPPU at 10 ppm concentration was done by dipping the fruits for 10 sec in the aqueous solution of compound at petal fall and 30 days after petal fall. CPPU applied fruits increased size by 20-70 g over control. Summer pruning along with CPPU application proved to be more effective in obtaining fruits of high grades with increased fruit weight (95.37 g fruit(-1)) and high quality. Summer pruning, when done by pinching 1/5th at Petal Fall stage + CPPU dipping (10 ml(-1)) and pinching 1/5th continued till harvest, at one month interval resulted in increased fruit yield (54.80 kg vine(-1)), high TSS (17.60 Brix), high total sugar (9.85%), advanced ripening by one week and reduced flesh firmness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPPU increased kiwifruit size by 20-70 g versus control.

Taxon
kiwi fruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
CPPUe0
Outcome
sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20-70 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CPPU applied fruits increased size by 20-70 g over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwi fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer pruning with CPPU produced high-grade fruit of increased weight.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
Summer pruning along with CPPU applicatione0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
95.37 g fruit(-1)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Summer pruning along with CPPU application proved to be more effective in obtaining fruits of high grades with increased fruit weight (95.37 g fruit(-1)) and high quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwi fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified pinching and CPPU treatment increased fruit yield to 54.80 kg per vine.

Taxon
kiwi fruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
pinching 1/5th at Petal Fall stage + CPPU dipping (10 ml(-1)) and pinching 1/5th continued till harvest, at one month intervale0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
54.80 kg vine(-1)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Summer pruning, when done by pinching 1/5th at Petal Fall stage + CPPU dipping (10 ml(-1)) and pinching 1/5th continued till harvest, at one month interval resulted in increased fruit yield (54.80 kg vine(-1)), high TSS (17.60 Brix), high total sugar (9.85%), advanced ripening by one week and reduced flesh firmness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwi fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pinching and CPPU treatment yielded high TSS of 17.60 Brix.

Taxon
kiwi fruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
highe0
Value
17.60 Brixe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high TSS (17.60 Brix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwi fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pinching and CPPU treatment yielded high total sugar of 9.85%.

Taxon
kiwi fruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
total sugare0
Direction
highe0
Value
9.85%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high total sugar (9.85%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwi fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pinching and CPPU treatment advanced ripening by one week.

Taxon
kiwi fruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
advancede0
Value
one weeke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“advanced ripening by one week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwi fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pinching and CPPU treatment reduced flesh firmness.

Taxon
kiwi fruitActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
flesh firmnesse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced flesh firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“kiwi fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑

forchlorfenuron · growth · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

forchlorfenuron · yield · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · yield · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

pruning · yield · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

tillage · yield · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.