Paper · 2024 · OBM Genetics

Phenotypic Characterization of Advanced Breeding Lines of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) for Drought and Low Phosphorus Stress Tolerance

Sopnil Ahmed Jahin; Biswajit Das; Adrita Abdullah; et al.

13
claims
31
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought and phosphorus (P) deficiency stress are two significant natural abiotic stresses restricting rice growth and yield worldwide. Developing rice varieties tolerant to drought and low P stress is crucial for sustainable agricultural production. To address these issues, two separate experiments were conducted using selected advanced rice breeding lines to study the impact of drought and low P stress on yield-attributing traits. The first experiment evaluated the drought stress tolerance of five advanced lines (Lines 14, 16, 20, and 22) under pot culture conditions by applying drought stress and not providing water throughout the reproductive stages (late booting to ripening). All genotypes under study exhibited a significant reduction in the yield of grain, ranging from 75.68% to 39.52%, as well as spikelet fertility and SPAD value when drought stress was applied; however, Line 20, BRRI dhan71, and Nerica 10 showed a less significant decrease. Conversely, days to first flowering, days to maturity, and the number of unfilled grains increased significantly in all of the genotypes studied; however, Line 20, BRRI dhan71, and Nerica10 showed a slight increase. Based on stress tolerance indices, Nerica 10, BRRI dhan71, and Line 20 are the best performers. In the second experiment, four advanced lines (Lines 3, 4, 6, and 20) were evaluated for low phosphorus (P) stress tolerance under conditions where no P fertilizer was applied. The application of low P stress significantly harmed all of the yield characteristics (excluding days to first flowering, days to maturity, and number of unfilled grains) of most of the genotypes, while Binadhan-17, Line 4, and Line 20 displayed a milder reduction, with overall grain yield reductions across genotypes ranging from 40.74% to 8.78%. Binadhan-17 and Line 20 showed higher stress tolerance indices and were classified as low P-tolerant genotypes. Considering both experimental results, the advanced breeding Line 20 was categorized as a promising advanced line. Therefore, Line 20 could be a potential donor parent for breeding drought and P deficiency-tolerant rice varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced grain yield in all studied rice genotypes, by 75.68% to 39.52%.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
yield of graine1
Direction
reductione1
Value
75.68% to 39.52%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant reduction in the yield of grain, ranging from 75.68% to 39.52%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–801 · show in text ↑
e2

“when drought stress was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced spikelet fertility and SPAD value in all studied rice genotypes.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
spikelet fertility and SPAD valuee1
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant reduction in the yield of grain, ranging from 75.68% to 39.52%, as well as spikelet fertility and SPAD value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–847 · show in text ↑
e2

“when drought stress was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, Line 20, BRRI dhan71 and Nerica 10 showed a less significant decrease in these traits than the other genotypes.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
Line 20, BRRI dhan71, and Nerica 10e1
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
less significant decreasee1
Direction
less significant decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“when drought stress was applied; however, Line 20, BRRI dhan71, and Nerica 10 showed a less significant decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, days to first flowering, days to maturity and number of unfilled grains increased significantly in all studied genotypes.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
days to first flowering, days to maturity, and the number of unfilled grainse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“days to first flowering, days to maturity, and the number of unfilled grains increased significantly in all of the genotypes studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1106 · show in text ↑
e2

“when drought stress was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line 20, BRRI dhan71 and Nerica 10 showed only a slight increase in days to first flowering, days to maturity and unfilled grains under drought.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
Line 20, BRRI dhan71, and Nerica10e1
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
days to first flowering, days to maturity, and the number of unfilled grainse1
Direction
slight increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“days to first flowering, days to maturity, and the number of unfilled grains increased significantly in all of the genotypes studied; however, Line 20, BRRI dhan71, and Nerica10 showed a slight increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1176 · show in text ↑
e2

“when drought stress was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–879 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Based on stress tolerance indices, Nerica 10, BRRI dhan71 and Line 20 were the best performers under drought.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
Nerica 10, BRRI dhan71, and Line 20e1
Outcome
best performerse1
Qualifier
stress tolerance indicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Based on stress tolerance indices, Nerica 10, BRRI dhan71, and Line 20 are the best performers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P stress significantly harmed all yield characteristics of most rice genotypes, except days to first flowering, days to maturity and number of unfilled grains.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
low P stresse1
Outcome
yield characteristicse1
Direction
harmede1
Qualifier
excluding days to first flowering, days to maturity, and number of unfilled grainse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“low P stress significantly harmed all of the yield characteristics (excluding days to first flowering, days to maturity, and number of unfilled grains) of most of the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low P stress, Binadhan-17, Line 4 and Line 20 displayed a milder reduction than other genotypes.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
Binadhan-17, Line 4, and Line 20e2
Treatment
low P stresse1
Outcome
milder reductione2
Direction
milder reductione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of low P stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1482 · show in text ↑
e2

“while Binadhan-17, Line 4, and Line 20 displayed a milder reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall grain yield reductions under low P stress across genotypes ranged from 40.74% to 8.78%.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
low P stresse2
Outcome
grain yield reductionse1
Direction
reductionse1
Value
40.74% to 8.78%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“overall grain yield reductions across genotypes ranging from 40.74% to 8.78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1798 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of low P stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1482 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Binadhan-17 and Line 20 showed higher stress tolerance indices under low P stress.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
Binadhan-17 and Line 20e1
Outcome
stress tolerance indicese1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Binadhan-17 and Line 20 showed higher stress tolerance indices and were classified as low P-tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1910 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Binadhan-17 and Line 20 were classified as low P-tolerant genotypes.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
Binadhan-17 and Line 20e1
Outcome
low P-tolerant genotypese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Binadhan-17 and Line 20 showed higher stress tolerance indices and were classified as low P-tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1910 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Considering both experiments, advanced breeding Line 20 was categorized as a promising advanced line.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Material
Line 20e1
Outcome
promising advanced linee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“the advanced breeding Line 20 was categorized as a promising advanced line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2025 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Line 20 could be a potential donor parent for breeding drought and P deficiency-tolerant rice varieties.

Material
Line 20e1
Outcome
potential donor parente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Line 20 could be a potential donor parent for breeding drought and P deficiency-tolerant rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2038–2141 · show in text ↑

drought · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

18 papers: 2 positive, 16 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

42 papers: 6 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

drought · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

325 papers: 76 positive, 249 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

321 papers more in this group

See all 325 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

475 papers: 419 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 419 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

471 papers more in this group

See all 475 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.