Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Synergistic effects of yeast and plant growth-promoting bacteria on Tobacco growth and soil-borne disease suppression: evidence from pot and field experiments

Kai Teng; Yu Zhou; Hui Mao; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) is an important economic crop, and the use of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) to enhance its growth and suppress soil-borne diseases has garnered considerable research interest. However, the potential of yeast to augment the growth-promoting and disease-suppressing effects of PGPB on tobacco remains unclear. Methods This study investigated the effects of Pichia sp. microbial fertilizer (J1), PGPB- Klebsiella oxytoca microbial fertilizer (ZS4), and their composite fertilizer (JZ) on tobacco growth indexes, soil properties, and soil microbial community through a pot experiment. Additionally, field experiments were conducted to further assess the efficacy of the composite microbial fertilizer on tobacco growth and the incidences of soil-borne diseases, including tobacco bacterial wilt (TBW) and tobacco black shank (TBS). Results and discussions In the pot experiment, application of the microbial fertilizers significantly enhanced soil organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), available phosphorus (AP), and available potassium (AK) levels. Compared to the control group (CK), J1, ZS4, and JZ microbial fertilizers significantly promoted tobacco growth, and the composite microbial fertilizers demonstrated superior to the individual microbial fertilizers. We found that the application of microbial fertilizer led to significant alterations in the structure and composition of the bacterial and fungal communities based on the high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions. The bacterial and fungal diversity indexes showed a decreasing trend. Key microorganisms such as Sphingomonas , Kitasatospora , Nitrosospira , Mortierella , and Trichoderma were identified as influential in regulating soil physicochemical parameters to enhance tobacco growth. Functional prediction further demonstrated a significant increase in the relative abundances of certain enzymes, including Alkaline phosphatase, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (ACC deaminase), and Peroxidase, as well as antimicrobial substances like Tetracycline, Isoquinoline alkaloid, and Phenylpropanoids, following inoculation with the fertilizer. Besides, field experiments revealed that the JZ fertilizer significantly promoted tobacco growth and reduced the incidence of TBW and TBS, indicating its potential for further application in tobacco cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizers increased soil nutrient and organic matter levels in pots.

Treatment
microbial fertilizerse0
Outcome
soil organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of the microbial fertilizers significantly enhanced soil organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), available phosphorus (AP), and available potassium (AK) levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

J1, ZS4, and JZ fertilizers promoted tobacco growth compared with the control.

Treatment
J1, ZS4, and JZ microbial fertilizerse0
Outcome
tobacco growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
control group (CK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control group (CK), J1, ZS4, and JZ microbial fertilizers significantly promoted tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The composite fertilizer outperformed individual fertilizers for tobacco growth.

Treatment
composite microbial fertilizerse0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
individual microbial fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the composite microbial fertilizers demonstrated superior to the individual microbial fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer altered bacterial and fungal community structure and composition.

Treatment
microbial fertilizere0
Outcome
structure and composition of the bacterial and fungal communitiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of microbial fertilizer led to significant alterations in the structure and composition of the bacterial and fungal communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial and fungal diversity indexes tended to decrease.

Outcome
bacterial and fungal diversity indexese0
Direction
decreasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial and fungal diversity indexes showed a decreasing trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several microbial genera were identified as influential in soil properties linked to tobacco growth.

Interactor
SphingomonasSphingomonase0other
Outcome
tobacco growthe0
Direction
enhancee0
Qualifier
Kitasatospora , Nitrosospira , Mortierella , and Trichodermae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sphingomonas
Sphingomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alan Rockefeller · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sphingomonas , Kitasatospora , Nitrosospira , Mortierella , and Trichoderma were identified as influential in regulating soil physicochemical parameters to enhance tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted abundance of alkaline phosphatase, ACC deaminase, and peroxidase increased following fertilizer inoculation.

Treatment
inoculation with the fertilizere0
Gene
Alkaline phosphatase, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (ACC deaminase), and Peroxidasee0
Outcome
relative abundances of certain enzymese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Functional prediction further demonstrated a significant increase in the relative abundances of certain enzymes, including Alkaline phosphatase, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (ACC deaminase), and Peroxidase, as well as antimicrobial substances like Tetracycline, Isoquinoline alkaloid, and Phenylpropanoids, following inoculation with the fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1897–2260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted abundance of tetracycline, isoquinoline alkaloid, and phenylpropanoids increased after fertilizer inoculation.

Treatment
inoculation with the fertilizere0
Outcome
antimicrobial substances like Tetracycline, Isoquinoline alkaloid, and Phenylpropanoidse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase in the relative abundances of certain enzymes, including Alkaline phosphatase, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (ACC deaminase), and Peroxidase, as well as antimicrobial substances like Tetracycline, Isoquinoline alkaloid, and Phenylpropanoids, following inoculation with the fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

JZ fertilizer promoted tobacco growth in the field.

Treatment
JZ fertilizere0
Outcome
tobacco growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“field experiments revealed that the JZ fertilizer significantly promoted tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2271–2358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JZ fertilizer reduced tobacco bacterial wilt incidence in the field.

Treatment
JZ fertilizere0
Outcome
incidence of TBWe0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“field experiments revealed that the JZ fertilizer significantly promoted tobacco growth and reduced the incidence of TBW and TBS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2271–2399 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco bacterial wilt (TBW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JZ fertilizer reduced tobacco black shank incidence in the field.

Treatment
JZ fertilizere0
Outcome
incidence of TBW and TBSe0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“field experiments revealed that the JZ fertilizer significantly promoted tobacco growth and reduced the incidence of TBW and TBS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2271–2399 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco black shank (TBS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: enzyme activity · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 92 positive, 8 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

fertilization · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 154 positive, 28 negative or no effect

153 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.