Abstract
Although corn is the most important and nitrogen (N)-fertilized crop, there is a lack of long-term data on the effects of organic and inorganic N fertilizers on the N balance and losses for corn systems under different tillage approaches. From 2012 to 2023, we assessed the effects of the N source on the grain yields from cultivated continuous corn receiving irrigation at a site with minimal erosion in Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, and compared these effects to no-till (NT) and strip till (ST) systems receiving inorganic N. An N balance accounting for N and carbon (C) sequestration found a system nitrogen use efficiency (NUESys) for organic N fertilizer (manure) with a tillage of 86.6%, which was higher than the NUESys of 62.6% with inorganic N fertilizer (enhanced efficiency fertilizer, EEF). Conventional tillage with manure use is a good management practice that contributed to higher grain yields (2 of 11 years), C sequestration (p < 0.05), soil organic N content (p < 0.05), and soil phosphorus (P) content than inorganic N fertilizer with tillage (p < 0.05). The tilled systems, whether receiving organic or inorganic N fertilizer, had higher yields and grain N content than the NT and ST systems receiving inorganic N fertilizer (p < 0.05). The grain production of the cultivated system receiving organic N fertilizer did not decrease with time, while the yields of the cultivated system receiving inorganic N fertilizer decreased with time (p < 0.05), suggesting that cultivated systems receiving organic N fertilizer may be more sustainable and better able to adapt to a changing climate. Additionally, a combination of manure (30% of N input) with EEF (70% of N input) contributed to a synergistic effect that increased the agronomic productivity (harvested grain yields).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Manure with tillage produced higher system nitrogen use efficiency than enhanced efficiency inorganic fertilizer.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- organic N fertilizer (manure)e0
- Outcome
- system nitrogen use efficiency (NUESys)e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 86.6%e0
- Qualifier
- 62.6%e0
- Comparator
- inorganic N fertilizer (enhanced efficiency fertilizer, EEF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“system nitrogen use efficiency (NUESys) for organic N fertilizer (manure) with a tillage of 86.6%, which was higher than the NUESys of 62.6% with inorganic N fertilizer (enhanced efficiency fertilizer, EEF)”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure with conventional tillage increased grain yields in two of eleven years relative to inorganic fertilizer with tillage.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- Conventional tillage with manure usee0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2 of 11 yearse0
- Comparator
- inorganic N fertilizer with tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Conventional tillage with manure use is a good management practice that contributed to higher grain yields (2 of 11 years), C sequestration (p < 0.05), soil organic N content (p < 0.05), and soil phosphorus (P) content than inorganic N fertilizer with tillage (p < 0.05)”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure with conventional tillage increased carbon sequestration relative to inorganic fertilizer with tillage.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- Conventional tillage with manure usee0
- Outcome
- C sequestratione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- inorganic N fertilizer with tillagee0
Not reportedValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Conventional tillage with manure use is a good management practice that contributed to higher grain yields (2 of 11 years), C sequestration (p < 0.05), soil organic N content (p < 0.05), and soil phosphorus (P) content than inorganic N fertilizer with tillage (p < 0.05)”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure with conventional tillage increased soil organic nitrogen content relative to inorganic fertilizer with tillage.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- Conventional tillage with manure usee0
- Outcome
- soil organic N contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- inorganic N fertilizer with tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Conventional tillage with manure use is a good management practice that contributed to higher grain yields (2 of 11 years), C sequestration (p < 0.05), soil organic N content (p < 0.05), and soil phosphorus (P) content than inorganic N fertilizer with tillage (p < 0.05)”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure with conventional tillage increased soil phosphorus content relative to inorganic fertilizer with tillage.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- Conventional tillage with manure usee0
- Outcome
- soil phosphorus (P) contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- inorganic N fertilizer with tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Conventional tillage with manure use is a good management practice that contributed to higher grain yields (2 of 11 years), C sequestration (p < 0.05), soil organic N content (p < 0.05), and soil phosphorus (P) content than inorganic N fertilizer with tillage (p < 0.05)”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Tilled systems had higher yields than no-till and strip-till systems receiving inorganic nitrogen.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- tilled systemse0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- NT and ST systems receiving inorganic N fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tilled systems, whether receiving organic or inorganic N fertilizer, had higher yields and grain N content than the NT and ST systems receiving inorganic N fertilizer (p < 0.05)”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Tilled systems had higher grain nitrogen content than no-till and strip-till systems receiving inorganic nitrogen.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- tilled systemse0
- Outcome
- grain N contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- NT and ST systems receiving inorganic N fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tilled systems, whether receiving organic or inorganic N fertilizer, had higher yields and grain N content than the NT and ST systems receiving inorganic N fertilizer (p < 0.05)”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain production with organic nitrogen fertilizer did not decrease over time.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- organic N fertilizere0
- Outcome
- grain productione0
- Direction
- did not decreasee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain production of the cultivated system receiving organic N fertilizer did not decrease with time”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Yields with inorganic nitrogen fertilizer decreased over time.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- inorganic N fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the yields of the cultivated system receiving inorganic N fertilizer decreased with time (p < 0.05)”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
A manure and enhanced efficiency fertilizer mixture increased harvested grain yields synergistically.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- combination of manure (30% of N input) with EEF (70% of N input)e0
- Outcome
- harvested grain yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a combination of manure (30% of N input) with EEF (70% of N input) contributed to a synergistic effect that increased the agronomic productivity (harvested grain yields)”
t0“Corn”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
185 papers more in this group
See all 189 papers →tillage · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →tillage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
123 papers more in this group
See all 127 papers →fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
335 papers more in this group
See all 339 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
1,160 papers more in this group
See all 1,164 papers →nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
2,181 papers more in this group
See all 2,185 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.