Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Long-Term Effects of Nitrogen Sources on Yields, Nitrogen Use Efficiencies, and Soil of Tilled and Irrigated Corn

Jorge A. Delgado; Robert E. D’Adamo; Catherine E. Stewart; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Although corn is the most important and nitrogen (N)-fertilized crop, there is a lack of long-term data on the effects of organic and inorganic N fertilizers on the N balance and losses for corn systems under different tillage approaches. From 2012 to 2023, we assessed the effects of the N source on the grain yields from cultivated continuous corn receiving irrigation at a site with minimal erosion in Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, and compared these effects to no-till (NT) and strip till (ST) systems receiving inorganic N. An N balance accounting for N and carbon (C) sequestration found a system nitrogen use efficiency (NUESys) for organic N fertilizer (manure) with a tillage of 86.6%, which was higher than the NUESys of 62.6% with inorganic N fertilizer (enhanced efficiency fertilizer, EEF). Conventional tillage with manure use is a good management practice that contributed to higher grain yields (2 of 11 years), C sequestration (p < 0.05), soil organic N content (p < 0.05), and soil phosphorus (P) content than inorganic N fertilizer with tillage (p < 0.05). The tilled systems, whether receiving organic or inorganic N fertilizer, had higher yields and grain N content than the NT and ST systems receiving inorganic N fertilizer (p < 0.05). The grain production of the cultivated system receiving organic N fertilizer did not decrease with time, while the yields of the cultivated system receiving inorganic N fertilizer decreased with time (p < 0.05), suggesting that cultivated systems receiving organic N fertilizer may be more sustainable and better able to adapt to a changing climate. Additionally, a combination of manure (30% of N input) with EEF (70% of N input) contributed to a synergistic effect that increased the agronomic productivity (harvested grain yields).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure with tillage produced higher system nitrogen use efficiency than enhanced efficiency inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
organic N fertilizer (manure)e0
Outcome
system nitrogen use efficiency (NUESys)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
86.6%e0
Qualifier
62.6%e0
Comparator
inorganic N fertilizer (enhanced efficiency fertilizer, EEF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“system nitrogen use efficiency (NUESys) for organic N fertilizer (manure) with a tillage of 86.6%, which was higher than the NUESys of 62.6% with inorganic N fertilizer (enhanced efficiency fertilizer, EEF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure with conventional tillage increased grain yields in two of eleven years relative to inorganic fertilizer with tillage.

Treatment
Conventional tillage with manure usee0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
2 of 11 yearse0
Comparator
inorganic N fertilizer with tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage with manure use is a good management practice that contributed to higher grain yields (2 of 11 years), C sequestration (p < 0.05), soil organic N content (p < 0.05), and soil phosphorus (P) content than inorganic N fertilizer with tillage (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure with conventional tillage increased carbon sequestration relative to inorganic fertilizer with tillage.

Treatment
Conventional tillage with manure usee0
Outcome
C sequestratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
inorganic N fertilizer with tillagee0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage with manure use is a good management practice that contributed to higher grain yields (2 of 11 years), C sequestration (p < 0.05), soil organic N content (p < 0.05), and soil phosphorus (P) content than inorganic N fertilizer with tillage (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure with conventional tillage increased soil organic nitrogen content relative to inorganic fertilizer with tillage.

Treatment
Conventional tillage with manure usee0
Outcome
soil organic N contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
inorganic N fertilizer with tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage with manure use is a good management practice that contributed to higher grain yields (2 of 11 years), C sequestration (p < 0.05), soil organic N content (p < 0.05), and soil phosphorus (P) content than inorganic N fertilizer with tillage (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure with conventional tillage increased soil phosphorus content relative to inorganic fertilizer with tillage.

Treatment
Conventional tillage with manure usee0
Outcome
soil phosphorus (P) contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
inorganic N fertilizer with tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage with manure use is a good management practice that contributed to higher grain yields (2 of 11 years), C sequestration (p < 0.05), soil organic N content (p < 0.05), and soil phosphorus (P) content than inorganic N fertilizer with tillage (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tilled systems had higher yields than no-till and strip-till systems receiving inorganic nitrogen.

Treatment
tilled systemse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NT and ST systems receiving inorganic N fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tilled systems, whether receiving organic or inorganic N fertilizer, had higher yields and grain N content than the NT and ST systems receiving inorganic N fertilizer (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tilled systems had higher grain nitrogen content than no-till and strip-till systems receiving inorganic nitrogen.

Treatment
tilled systemse0
Outcome
grain N contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NT and ST systems receiving inorganic N fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tilled systems, whether receiving organic or inorganic N fertilizer, had higher yields and grain N content than the NT and ST systems receiving inorganic N fertilizer (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain production with organic nitrogen fertilizer did not decrease over time.

Treatment
organic N fertilizere0
Outcome
grain productione0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain production of the cultivated system receiving organic N fertilizer did not decrease with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields with inorganic nitrogen fertilizer decreased over time.

Treatment
inorganic N fertilizere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yields of the cultivated system receiving inorganic N fertilizer decreased with time (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A manure and enhanced efficiency fertilizer mixture increased harvested grain yields synergistically.

Treatment
combination of manure (30% of N input) with EEF (70% of N input)e0
Outcome
harvested grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of manure (30% of N input) with EEF (70% of N input) contributed to a synergistic effect that increased the agronomic productivity (harvested grain yields)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

tillage · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 68 positive, 14 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 93 positive, 34 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.