Abstract
In a field experiment (2011-2013) we studied the effect of foliar fertilization on the yield of modern sugar beet hybrids of Ukrainian selection and we established the optimal harvesting dates for the conditions of right-bank forest-steppe of Ukraine. The obtained results showed that foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield of hybrids (Alexandria, Romulus, Kvarta, Zluka) by September 1 – 2,3-6,6 t/ha, September 20 – 2,8-8,1 t/ha, October 10 2,6-7,0 t/ha. Sugar content of roots was increased on September 1 by 0,9-1,4 %, on September 20 by 0,8-1,7 %, on October 10 by 1,2-1,8 %, sugar yield gain on September 1 was 1,1-1,9 t / ha, on September 20 - 1,3-2,3 t/ha, on October - 10 – 1,6-2,4 t/ha in comparison with the control variant. The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10 provides an increase of root yield from 4,5 to 6,7 t/ha, beet sugar content increases by 1,0-1,9%, and the yield of sugar - 1,5-2,2 t/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar microfertilizers increased root yield on September 1 by 2,3-6,6 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1 - Treatment
- foliar feeding with microfertilizerse0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 2,3-6,6 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- September 1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield of hybrids (Alexandria, Romulus, Kvarta, Zluka) by September 1 – 2,3-6,6 t/ha”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar microfertilizers increased root yield on September 20 by 2,8-8,1 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- foliar feeding with microfertilizerse2
- Outcome
- root yielde2
- Direction
- increasee2
- Value
- 2,8-8,1 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- September 20e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“September 20 – 2,8-8,1 t/ha”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar microfertilizers increased root yield on October 10 by 2,6-7,0 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- foliar feeding with microfertilizerse2
- Outcome
- root yielde2
- Direction
- increasee2
- Value
- 2,6-7,0 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- October 10e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“October 10 2,6-7,0 t/ha”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding increased root sugar content on September 1 by 0,9-1,4 %.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- foliar feeding with microfertilizerse2
- Outcome
- Sugar content of rootse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0,9-1,4 %e0
- Qualifier
- September 1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar content of roots was increased on September 1 by 0,9-1,4 %”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding increased root sugar content on September 20 by 0,8-1,7 %.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- foliar feeding with microfertilizerse2
- Outcome
- Sugar content of rootse3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 0,8-1,7 %e0
- Qualifier
- September 20e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on September 20 by 0,8-1,7 %”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding increased root sugar content on October 10 by 1,2-1,8 %.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- foliar feeding with microfertilizerse2
- Outcome
- Sugar content of rootse3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 1,2-1,8 %e0
- Qualifier
- October 10e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on October 10 by 1,2-1,8 %”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding increased sugar yield on September 1 by 1,1-1,9 t / ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- foliar feeding with microfertilizerse2
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Direction
- gaine0
- Value
- 1,1-1,9 t / hae0
- Qualifier
- September 1e0
- Comparator
- control variante5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sugar yield gain on September 1 was 1,1-1,9 t / ha”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding increased sugar yield on September 20 by 1,3-2,3 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- foliar feeding with microfertilizerse2
- Outcome
- sugar yielde4
- Direction
- gaine4
- Value
- 1,3-2,3 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- September 20e0
- Comparator
- control variante5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on September 20 - 1,3-2,3 t/ha”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding increased sugar yield on October 10 by 1,6-2,4 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- foliar feeding with microfertilizerse2
- Outcome
- sugar yielde4
- Direction
- gaine4
- Value
- 1,6-2,4 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- October - 10e0
- Comparator
- control variante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on October - 10 – 1,6-2,4 t/ha in comparison with the control variant”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
Claim · model-written summary
Moving harvest from September 1 to October 10 increased root yield by 4,5 to 6,7 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- October 10e0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 4,5 to 6,7 t/hae0
- Comparator
- September 1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10 provides an increase of root yield from 4,5 to 6,7 t/ha”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
Claim · model-written summary
Moving harvest to October 10 increased beet sugar content by 1,0-1,9%.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- October 10e6
- Outcome
- beet sugar contente0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 1,0-1,9%e0
- Comparator
- September 1e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“beet sugar content increases by 1,0-1,9%”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
Claim · model-written summary
Moving harvest to October 10 increased sugar yield by 1,5-2,2 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Treatment
- October 10e6
- Outcome
- yield of sugare0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 1,5-2,2 t/hae0
- Comparator
- September 1e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the yield of sugar - 1,5-2,2 t/ha”
e1“modern sugar beet hybrids”
e2“foliar feeding with microfertilizers (Reakom, Tseovit, Rostok) provides an increase in root yield”
e3“Sugar content of roots was increased”
e4“sugar yield gain on September 1”
e5“in comparison with the control variant”
e6“The transfer of harvesting dates from September 1 to October 10”
The same questions in other papers
micronutrient · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →micronutrient · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.