Paper · 2024 · Plant Biotechnology

Genome editing in cells of apple cultivar ‘Fuji’ using geminivirus-derived replicons for transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 components

Katsuya Negishi; Masaki Endo; Tomoko Endo; et al.

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system has been used for genome editing in various fruit trees, including apple (Malus x domestica). In previous studies, transfer DNA (T-DNA) expressing genome editing tools, Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) and single guide RNA (sgRNA), was stably integrated into the apple genome via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. However, due to self-incompatibility, long generation period, and the high heterozygosity of apple, removing only the integrated T-DNA from the apple genome by crossbreeding while maintaining the introduced varietal trait is difficult. Therefore, an efficient SpCas9-sgRNA delivery system without transgene insertion is required for genome editing of apple. In this study, we used geminivirus-derived replicons (GVRs) for the transient expression of genome editing tools. Small DNA vectors were deconstructed by splitting the elements necessary for the production of GVRs from bean yellow dwarf virus into two vectors. Production of GVRs using these vectors was demonstrated in Arabidopsis and apple cells. Genome editing was improved by using the GVR-producing vectors with genome editing tools in Arabidopsis protoplasts. The use of the GVR-producing vectors for SpCas9 and sgRNA delivery into apple leaves improved the expression levels of SpCas9 and sgRNA, enabling the detection of targeted mutations introduced in the endogenous apple genome. These findings demonstrate the utility of GVRs in genome editing via transient gene expression in apple. It can be expected that our GVR-based genome editing technology has potential utility for transgene-free genome editing in apple.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Geminivirus-derived replicons were produced from the split vectors in apple cells.

Taxon
Malus x domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
Production of GVRse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“including apple (Malus x domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–205 · show in text ↑
e2

“Production of GVRs using these vectors was demonstrated in Arabidopsis and apple cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GVR-producing vectors improved genome editing in Arabidopsis protoplasts.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsise3
Organ / stage
protoplastse3
Treatment
GVR-producing vectors with genome editing toolse3
Outcome
Genome editinge3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–41 · show in text ↑
e3

“Genome editing was improved by using the GVR-producing vectors with genome editing tools in Arabidopsis protoplasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GVR-producing vectors for SpCas9 and sgRNA delivery improved SpCas9 and sgRNA expression levels in apple leaves.

Taxon
Malus x domesticaMalus domesticae0
Organ / stage
leavese4
Treatment
GVR-producing vectors for SpCas9 and sgRNA deliverye4
Gene
SpCas9e4
Outcome
expression levels of SpCas9 and sgRNAe4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“including apple (Malus x domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–205 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of the GVR-producing vectors for SpCas9 and sgRNA delivery into apple leaves improved the expression levels of SpCas9 and sgRNA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1395 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GVR-based delivery enabled detection of targeted mutations in the endogenous apple genome.

Taxon
Malus x domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
detection of targeted mutationse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“including apple (Malus x domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–205 · show in text ↑
e5

“enabling the detection of targeted mutations introduced in the endogenous apple genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1483 · show in text ↑

loss of function · molecular: expression · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 4 positive, 11 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.