Abstract
A field trail was conducted at Kulbhaskar Ashram College, Prayagraj during two consecutive Rabi season, 2019-20 and 2020-21, to evaluate the outcome of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based inter cropping systems (Wheat with Chickpea, Wheat with Mustard and Wheat with Linseed) with different row ratios (2:2, 3:2 and 4:2) under irrigated conditions. Inter-cropping reduced the values of growth parameters and yield attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum), mustard (Brassica campestris) and linseed (Linum usitatisemum) against their sole crops. Inter- cropping of wheat with chickpea in 2:2 row ratio recorded significantly higher wheat equivalent yield (WEY) 47.94 qt//ha, land equivalent ratio (LER) 1.39, net income (NI) Rs.85118/ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.55 in comparison to sole crop of wheat 40.88 qt./ha, 1.0, Rs.74050/ha and 2.36, sole crop of chickpea 28.66 qt./ha, 1.01, Rs.43967/ha and 1.51, sloe crop of mustard 26.50 qt./ha, 1.01, Rs.41235/ha & 1.52,and sloe crop of linseed 27.95 qt./ha, 1.02, Rs.44510/ha and 1.65, as WEY, LER, net income, and B:C ratio, respectively. Wheat intercropped in 2:2 row proportion with chickpea produced 17.27 percent higher WEY and 14.94 percent higher net return over sole crop of wheat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat-chickpea intercropping in 2:2 row ratio raised wheat equivalent yield above sole wheat
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Inter- cropping of wheat with chickpea in 2:2 row ratioe4
- Outcome
- wheat equivalent yield (WEY)e4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 47.94 qt//hae4
- Qualifier
- 17.27 percent highere6
- Comparator
- sole crop of wheate4
- Setting
- Kulbhaskar Ashram College, Prayagraje1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Comparative performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based inter cropping systems”
e1“A field trail was conducted at Kulbhaskar Ashram College, Prayagraj”
e4“Inter- cropping of wheat with chickpea in 2:2 row ratio recorded significantly higher wheat equivalent yield (WEY) 47.94 qt//ha, land equivalent ratio (LER) 1.39, net income (NI) Rs.85118/ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.55 in comparison to sole crop of wheat 40.88 qt./ha, 1.0, Rs.74050/ha and 2.36”
e6“Wheat intercropped in 2:2 row proportion with chickpea produced 17.27 percent higher WEY and 14.94 percent higher net return over sole crop of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat-chickpea 2:2 intercropping raised land equivalent ratio above sole wheat
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- Inter- cropping of wheat with chickpea in 2:2 row ratioe4
- Outcome
- land equivalent ratio (LER)e4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 1.39e4
- Comparator
- sole crop of wheate4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Comparative performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based inter cropping systems”
e4“Inter- cropping of wheat with chickpea in 2:2 row ratio recorded significantly higher wheat equivalent yield (WEY) 47.94 qt//ha, land equivalent ratio (LER) 1.39, net income (NI) Rs.85118/ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.55 in comparison to sole crop of wheat 40.88 qt./ha, 1.0, Rs.74050/ha and 2.36”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat-chickpea 2:2 intercropping raised net income above sole wheat
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- Inter- cropping of wheat with chickpea in 2:2 row ratioe4
- Outcome
- net income (NI)e4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- Rs.85118/hae4
- Comparator
- sole crop of wheate4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Comparative performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based inter cropping systems”
e4“Inter- cropping of wheat with chickpea in 2:2 row ratio recorded significantly higher wheat equivalent yield (WEY) 47.94 qt//ha, land equivalent ratio (LER) 1.39, net income (NI) Rs.85118/ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.55 in comparison to sole crop of wheat 40.88 qt./ha, 1.0, Rs.74050/ha and 2.36”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat-chickpea 2:2 intercropping raised benefit:cost ratio above sole wheat
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- Inter- cropping of wheat with chickpea in 2:2 row ratioe4
- Outcome
- benefit: cost ratioe4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 2.55e4
- Comparator
- sole crop of wheate4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Comparative performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based inter cropping systems”
e4“Inter- cropping of wheat with chickpea in 2:2 row ratio recorded significantly higher wheat equivalent yield (WEY) 47.94 qt//ha, land equivalent ratio (LER) 1.39, net income (NI) Rs.85118/ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.55 in comparison to sole crop of wheat 40.88 qt./ha, 1.0, Rs.74050/ha and 2.36”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat-chickpea 2:2 intercropping gave a higher net return than sole wheat
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume6
- Treatment
- Wheat intercropped in 2:2 row proportion with chickpeae6
- Outcome
- net returne6
- Direction
- highere6
- Value
- 14.94 percente6
- Comparator
- sole crop of wheate6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Comparative performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based inter cropping systems”
e6“Wheat intercropped in 2:2 row proportion with chickpea produced 17.27 percent higher WEY and 14.94 percent higher net return over sole crop of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping with wheat reduced growth and yield attributes of chickpea against sole crop
- Taxon
- Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
Cicer arietinume2 - Treatment
- Inter-croppinge2
- Outcome
- growth parameters and yield attributese2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Comparator
- sole cropse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Comparative performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based inter cropping systems”
e2“Inter-cropping reduced the values of growth parameters and yield attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum), mustard (Brassica campestris) and linseed (Linum usitatisemum) against their sole crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping with wheat reduced growth and yield attributes of mustard against sole crop
- Taxon
- mustard (Brassica campestris)
.jpg?width=60)
Brassica rapa subsp. oleiferae2 - Treatment
- Inter-croppinge2
- Outcome
- growth parameters and yield attributese2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Comparator
- sole cropse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Comparative performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based inter cropping systems”
e2“Inter-cropping reduced the values of growth parameters and yield attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum), mustard (Brassica campestris) and linseed (Linum usitatisemum) against their sole crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping with wheat reduced growth and yield attributes of linseed against sole crop
Verbatim
t0“Comparative performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based inter cropping systems”
e2“Inter-cropping reduced the values of growth parameters and yield attributes of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum), mustard (Brassica campestris) and linseed (Linum usitatisemum) against their sole crops”
The same questions in other papers
Cicer arietinum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
185 papers more in this group
See all 189 papers →intercropping · yield · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →intercropping · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →intercropping · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.