Abstract

Field experiment was conducted to find out the effect of surface and subsurface methods of irrigation and the method of fertilizer application on movement of nutrients in sugarcane, at Agricultural Research Station, Bhavanisagar. The experiment was laid out in strip plot design in a plot size of 45 m2 with 2 main plot treatments viz; M1 - Drip irrigation at 80% PE once in two days with 1.5 m lateral and M2 - Subsurface irrigation at 100% PE and 5 subplot treatments, ie., S1 - Absolute control, S2 - Manual - Band application of N, P and K fertilizers, S3 - Manual - Hole placement application of N, P and K fertilizers, S4 - Application of N and K through irrigation water and P as basal and S5 - Application of nutrients through water soluble fertilizers (N, P and K) and replicated thrice. The result of the experiment revealed that subsurface irrigation at 100% PE with manual - hole placement application of N, P and K fertilizers) is superior in enhancing the growth and yield attributes and yield of sugarcane when compared to other treatment combinations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface irrigation at 100% PE with manual hole placement of N, P and K fertilizers was superior in enhancing sugarcane growth, yield attributes and yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
subsurface irrigation at 100% PE with manual - hole placement application of N, P and K fertilizerse0
Outcome
growth and yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
superior in enhancinge0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0
Setting
Agricultural Research Station, Bhavanisagare1

Verbatim

e0

“subsurface irrigation at 100% PE with manual - hole placement application of N, P and K fertilizers) is superior in enhancing the growth and yield attributes and yield of sugarcane when compared to other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Agricultural Research Station, Bhavanisagar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Studies on the effect of surface and subsurface methods of irrigation and method of fertilizer application on growth and yield parameters, yield, economics and water use efficiency in sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 55 positive, 2 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 129 positive, 13 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.