Paper · 2024 · Contemporary Agriculture

Preservation Properties of Citrus Essential Oils in Fruits Against Food Spoilage Microorganisms

Oluwatayo Benjamin Ajayi-Moses; Clement Olusola Ogidi; Bamidele Juliet Akinyele

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Summary Pre- and post-harvest spoilage of fruits due to microbial contamination leads to significant economic losses. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the antimicrobial and preservative potential of citrus essential oils (CEOs) extracted from the peels of lime (Citrus aurantifolia), lemon (Citrus limon), and grapefruit (Citrus paradisi). Microorganisms were isolated from apples, cucumbers, tomatoes and oranges using conventional microbiological methods. The in vivo antimicrobial activity of CEOs was assessed against microorganisms in apparently healthy oranges and apples. Bacillus cereus and Penicillium digitatum caused the largest lesions on fruits, with diameters ranging from 28 to 37 mm and 36 to 46 mm, respectively. Disease severity of 86.55% and 91.67 % was observed in the untreated oranges following inoculation with Bacillus cereus and Penicillium digitatum, respectively. The combination of CEOs, applied at a concentration of 100 mg/mL, effectively prevented disease occurrence in both apples and oranges. In contrast, the unpreserved apples and oranges had the highest fungal counts of 9.40 x 10 6 and 3.55 x 10 7 CFU/g, respectively. CEOs were found to extend the shelf life of fruits and preserve their quality without altering organoleptic properties. The bioactive compounds in CEOs can be extracted and utilized as preservative agents to mitigate microbial spoilage of fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus cereus caused the largest lesions on fruits, 28 to 37 mm in diameter.

Taxon
fruitse1
Interactor
Bacillus cereusBacillus cereuse1pathogen
Outcome
largest lesionse1
Value
28 to 37 mme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Bacillus cereus and Penicillium digitatum caused the largest lesions on fruits, with diameters ranging from 28 to 37 mm and 36 to 46 mm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–743 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium digitatum caused the largest lesions on fruits, 36 to 46 mm in diameter.

Taxon
fruitse1
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatume1pathogen
Outcome
largest lesionse1
Value
36 to 46 mme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Bacillus cereus and Penicillium digitatum caused the largest lesions on fruits, with diameters ranging from 28 to 37 mm and 36 to 46 mm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–743 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated oranges reached 86.55% disease severity after inoculation with Bacillus cereus.

Taxon
orangese2
Treatment
inoculatione2
Interactor
Bacillus cereusBacillus cereuse2pathogen
Outcome
Disease severitye2
Value
86.55%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Disease severity of 86.55% and 91.67 % was observed in the untreated oranges following inoculation with Bacillus cereus and Penicillium digitatum, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–904 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated oranges reached 91.67 % disease severity after inoculation with Penicillium digitatum.

Taxon
orangese2
Treatment
inoculatione2
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatume2pathogen
Outcome
Disease severitye2
Value
91.67 %e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Disease severity of 86.55% and 91.67 % was observed in the untreated oranges following inoculation with Bacillus cereus and Penicillium digitatum, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of CEOs at 100 mg/mL effectively prevented disease occurrence in apples.

Treatment
combination of CEOs, applied at a concentration of 100 mg/mLe3
Outcome
disease occurrencee3
Direction
preventede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The combination of CEOs, applied at a concentration of 100 mg/mL, effectively prevented disease occurrence in both apples and oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of CEOs at 100 mg/mL effectively prevented disease occurrence in oranges.

Taxon
orangese3
Treatment
combination of CEOs, applied at a concentration of 100 mg/mLe3
Outcome
disease occurrencee3
Direction
preventede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“The combination of CEOs, applied at a concentration of 100 mg/mL, effectively prevented disease occurrence in both apples and oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1039 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unpreserved apples had the highest fungal count, 9.40 x 10 6 CFU/g.

Outcome
fungal countse4
Direction
higheste4
Value
9.40 x 10 6e4
Qualifier
unpreservede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In contrast, the unpreserved apples and oranges had the highest fungal counts of 9.40 x 10 6 and 3.55 x 10 7 CFU/g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unpreserved oranges had the highest fungal count, 3.55 x 10 7 CFU/g.

Taxon
orangese4
Outcome
fungal countse4
Direction
higheste4
Value
3.55 x 10 7e4
Qualifier
unpreservede4

Verbatim

e4

“In contrast, the unpreserved apples and oranges had the highest fungal counts of 9.40 x 10 6 and 3.55 x 10 7 CFU/g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CEOs extended the shelf life of fruits.

Taxon
fruitse5
Treatment
CEOse5
Outcome
shelf lifee5
Direction
extende5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5

“CEOs were found to extend the shelf life of fruits and preserve their quality without altering organoleptic properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CEOs preserved fruit quality without altering organoleptic properties.

Taxon
fruitse5
Treatment
CEOse5
Outcome
qualitye5
Direction
preservee5
Qualifier
without altering organoleptic propertiese5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5

“CEOs were found to extend the shelf life of fruits and preserve their quality without altering organoleptic properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1289 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Citrus essential oil bioactive compounds can be used as preservatives to mitigate microbial spoilage of fruits.

Taxon
fruitse6
Outcome
microbial spoilagee6

Verbatim

e6

“The bioactive compounds in CEOs can be extracted and utilized as preservative agents to mitigate microbial spoilage of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1416 · show in text ↑

botanical · disease · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

botanical · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

botanical · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.