Abstract
This investigation was carried out during 2010 and 2021 seasons on Early Sweet and Thompson Seedless grapevines cvs., cultivated in sandy soil located at Malawi district - El-Minia Governorate, Egypt. The two examined cvs. were irrigated by using drip irrigation system. This study was focused on the response of Early Sweet and Thompson Seedless cvs. to inoculation with Arbuscular Mycrrohiza Fungi (AMF), Azospirillum bacteria and Azotobacter bacteria individually or in combination. The obtained shows that inoculated the Early Sweet and Thompson Seedless were very effective in improving the nutritional status, productivity and berry physical and chemical properties. The combined inoculations with any two micro-organisms were more effective than the individual inoculations. However, the best results were obtained when the vines received the three micro-organisms in combination. Then, it is strongly recommended to inoculating the Early Sweet and Thompson Seedless cvs. grown in sandy soil with AMF, Azospirillum and Azotobacter in combination three times yearly, to enhancing the nutritional status, productivity and improving berries physical and chemical properties.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inoculation with any two micro-organisms was more effective than individual inoculations in grapevines.
- Treatment
- combined inoculations with any two micro-organismse1
- Outcome
- effectivee1
- Direction
- more effectivee1
- Comparator
- individual inoculationse1
VitisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Early Sweet and Thompson Seedless grapevines cvs.”
e1“The combined inoculations with any two micro-organisms were more effective than the individual inoculations”
Claim · model-written summary
The three-micro-organism combined inoculation gave the best results in grapevines.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Early Sweet and Thompson Seedless grapevines cvs.”
e2“However, the best results were obtained when the vines received the three micro-organisms in combination”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation improved nutritional status, productivity, and berry physical and chemical properties of grapevines.
- Treatment
- inoculation with Arbuscular Mycrrohiza Fungi (AMF), Azospirillum bacteria and Azotobacter bacteriae5
- Interactor
- Arbuscular Mycrrohiza Fungi (AMF)e5symbiont
- Second interactor
- Azospirillum bacteriae5symbiont
- Outcome
- nutritional status, productivity and berry physical and chemical propertiese3
- Direction
- improvinge3
- Qualifier
- Azotobacter bacteriae5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Early Sweet and Thompson Seedless grapevines cvs.”
e3“inoculated the Early Sweet and Thompson Seedless were very effective in improving the nutritional status, productivity and berry physical and chemical properties”
e5“inoculation with Arbuscular Mycrrohiza Fungi (AMF), Azospirillum bacteria and Azotobacter bacteria”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculating grapevines grown in sandy soil with AMF, Azospirillum and Azotobacter in combination three times yearly is recommended to enhance nutritional status, productivity and berry properties.
Verbatim
e4“Then, it is strongly recommended to inoculating the Early Sweet and Thompson Seedless cvs. grown in sandy soil with AMF, Azospirillum and Azotobacter in combination three times yearly, to enhancing the nutritional status, productivity and improving berries physical and chemical properties”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · yield · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · yield · VitisPositive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →mycorrhiza · yield · VitisResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.