Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated and non-inoculated vines had equivalent growth, survival and productivity.
- Treatment
- inoculatede0
- Interactor
- AM fungal inoculante1symbiont
- Outcome
- growth, survival, and productivitye0
- Direction
- equivalente0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated vinese0
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculated and non-inoculated vines displayed equivalent growth, survival, and productivity”
e1“commercial AM fungal inoculant in grapevine”
Title
Thomsen, Corrina Nicole cIRcle (University of British Columbia) 2018. doi:10.14288/1.0371601
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Observation The inoculant was already present before inoculation.
- Intervention effect No inoculation strategy established the inoculant.
- Observation A background population of the inoculant strain was detected each year.
- Observation Soil phosphorus levels were notably high.