Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar biofertilizer treatments increased grapevine yield compared with the control.

A claim from Effects of Foliar Biofertilizer Sprays on Nutrient Uptake, Yield, and Quality Parameters of Blaufrankish (Vitis viniferaL.) Grapes · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar biofertilizer treatments increased grapevine yield compared with the control.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Material
cv. Blaufrankishe0
Treatment
Foliar Biofertilizer Sprayst0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
Noszvaj in northeastern Hungarye0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Foliar Biofertilizer Sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–38
e0

“The study was conducted in 2012 at Noszvaj in northeastern Hungary in a 24-year-old grapevine plantation on cv. Blaufrankish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–698
e1

“Treatments increased the yield but did not affect the fruit quality compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1000

Title

Effects of Foliar Biofertilizer Sprays on Nutrient Uptake, Yield, and Quality Parameters of Blaufrankish (Vitis viniferaL.) Grapes

Péter Tamás Nagy; Tamás Pintér Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2014. doi:10.1080/00103624.2014.989016

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-8f0bbff6bee2aeb4615a6128b4753517244d10eea1300c3133d1813ea6abc4ff · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

87 papers: 80 positive, 7 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.