Paper · 2024 · Plant Production Science

Harnessing genetic diversity in cotton for enhanced resilience against salt stress by using agro-physiological characters

Muhammad Mubashar Zafar; Aqsa Ijaz; Zunaira Anwar; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Creating salt-tolerant genotypes is crucial for maximizing the productivity under salinized land. To evaluate genetic diversity for salt tolerance, 35 diverse cotton accessions were screened under 17 dS m−1 salt stress conditions using 20 agronomic and physiological traits relevant to salt tolerance. The general linear model analysis indicated significant salinity impacts across the studied accessions, and genotype × treatment effects were also significant for all parameters examined. Among all 35 studied accessions; the genotypes CCB-1, CCB-2, CCB-28, CCB-3, CCB-4, Ghauri-1, JSQ-70, and JSQ-71 showed considerably higher performance for plant height, boll per plant, boll weight, lint percentage, seed cotton yield and fiber quality traits under salt stress. Physiological traits, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, total soluble proteins, K+, and K+/Na+ were reduced under saline conditions, while biochemical traits such as catalase, superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, H2O2 and MDA level increased. The genotypes CCB-17, CCB-18, CCB-19, CCB-20, CCB-21, CCB-22, Hatf-3, Badar-1, Eagle-2, Eagle-4, CCB-23, CCB-24, CCB-25, CCB-26 and CCB-28 exhibited lower values for agro-physiological and fiber quality character respectively, signifying their sensitivity to salt stress. Under salinity, these genotypes showed reduced antioxidant levels and increased values for K+/Na+, Na+, H2O2, and MDA contents. Whereas the genotypes CCB-5, CCB-6, CCB-7, CCB-8, CCB-9, CCB-10, CCB-11, CCB-12, CCB-13, CCB-14, CCB-15, and CCB-16 demonstrated moderate performance for these traits under salt stress conditions respectively. Utilizing multivariate analysis techniques (cluster and PCA), 35 genotypes have been categorized into three groups based on studied traits: tolerant (cluster-1), moderately tolerant (cluster-2), and susceptible (cluster-3) under saline conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity had significant effects across cotton accessions.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
salinity impactse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The general linear model analysis indicated significant salinity impacts across the studied accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by treatment effects were significant for all examined parameters.

Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
all parameters examinede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotype × treatment effects were also significant for all parameters examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight named genotypes performed better for growth, yield, and fiber traits under salt stress.

Outcome
plant height, boll per plant, boll weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under salt stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the genotypes CCB-1, CCB-2, CCB-28, CCB-3, CCB-4, Ghauri-1, JSQ-70, and JSQ-71 showed considerably higher performance for plant height, boll per plant, boll weight, lint percentage, seed cotton yield and fiber quality traits under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll, carotenoids, soluble protein, K+, and K+/Na+ declined under salinity.

Treatment
saline conditionse0
Outcome
chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, total soluble proteinse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, total soluble proteins, K+, and K+/Na+ were reduced under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzymes, H2O2, and MDA increased under salinity.

Outcome
catalase, superoxide dismutase, peroxidasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“catalase, superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, H2O2 and MDA level increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A set of genotypes showed low agronomic, physiological, and fiber quality values and was classified as salt sensitive.

Outcome
agro-physiological and fiber quality charactere0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the genotypes CCB-17, CCB-18, CCB-19, CCB-20, CCB-21, CCB-22, Hatf-3, Badar-1, Eagle-2, Eagle-4, CCB-23, CCB-24, CCB-25, CCB-26 and CCB-28 exhibited lower values for agro-physiological and fiber quality character respectively, signifying their sensitivity to salt stress”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1010–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sensitive genotypes had reduced antioxidant levels under salinity.

Outcome
antioxidant levelse0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under salinity, these genotypes showed reduced antioxidant levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sensitive genotypes had increased K+/Na+, Na+, H2O2 and MDA under salinity.

Outcome
K+/Na+, Na+, H2O2e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased values for K+/Na+, Na+, H2O2, and MDA contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve CCB genotypes had moderate performance under salinity.

Outcome
moderate performancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the genotypes CCB-5, CCB-6, CCB-7, CCB-8, CCB-9, CCB-10, CCB-11, CCB-12, CCB-13, CCB-14, CCB-15, and CCB-16 demonstrated moderate performance for these traits under salt stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multivariate analysis placed 35 genotypes into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups.

Outcome
three groupse0
Value
35 genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“35 genotypes have been categorized into three groups based on studied traits: tolerant (cluster-1), moderately tolerant (cluster-2), and susceptible (cluster-3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

16 papers: 1 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.