Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Genome-Wide Identification of the SlSET Gene Family and the Function of SlSET6 Under Salt Stress

Xueying Yang; Yan Gao; Chengyu Zhu; et al.

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A comprehensive genome-wide identification of SET-domain-containing genes in Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) has revealed 46 members. Phylogenetic analysis showed that these SET genes, along with those from Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, are divided into five subfamilies, with Subfamilies II and V being the largest. Motif and domain analyses identified 15 conserved motifs and revealed the presence of pre-SET and post-SET domains in several genes, suggesting functional diversification. Gene structure analysis further demonstrated variation in exon–intron organization, likely contributing to differential gene regulation. Promoter analysis identified cis-acting elements related to light responsiveness, plant growth, hormones, and stress, implicating SET genes in various biological processes. RNA-seq and qRT-PCR data revealed distinct expression patterns of SlSET genes under salt stress, with several genes showing significant upregulation, indicating their potential role in stress tolerance. In particular, SlSET6 silencing using VIGS reduced tomato’s tolerance to salt stress, leading to higher lipid peroxidation, reduced antioxidant enzyme activity, and decreased proline content, further confirming its critical role in salt stress response. These findings provide valuable insights into the functional diversity, evolutionary history, and stress-related roles of SET domain genes in tomato, with potential applications for crop improvement strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A genome-wide analysis identified 46 SET-domain-containing genes in tomato.

Gene
SET-domain-containing genese0
Outcome
revealed 46 memberse0
Value
46e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A comprehensive genome-wide identification of SET-domain-containing genes in Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) has revealed 46 members”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato SET genes, together with those of Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, fall into five subfamilies, with Subfamilies II and V the largest.

Gene
SET genese1
Outcome
divided into five subfamiliese1
Value
five subfamiliese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“these SET genes, along with those from Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, are divided into five subfamilies, with Subfamilies II and V being the largest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–322 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Motif and domain analyses identified 15 conserved motifs in the tomato SET genes.

Outcome
conserved motifse1
Value
15e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Motif and domain analyses identified 15 conserved motifs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-SET and post-SET domains were present in several tomato SET genes.

Gene
several genese1
Outcome
presence of pre-SET and post-SET domainse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“revealed the presence of pre-SET and post-SET domains in several genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–455 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene structure analysis showed variation in exon–intron organization among tomato SET genes.

Outcome
variation in exon–intron organizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gene structure analysis further demonstrated variation in exon–intron organization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–578 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Promoter analysis identified cis-acting elements related to light responsiveness, plant growth, hormones and stress.

Outcome
cis-acting elementse1
Qualifier
light responsiveness, plant growth, hormones, and stresse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Promoter analysis identified cis-acting elements related to light responsiveness, plant growth, hormones, and stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RNA-seq and qRT-PCR showed distinct expression patterns of SlSET genes under salt stress, with several genes significantly upregulated.

Treatment
salt stresse1
Gene
SlSET genese1
Outcome
distinct expression patternse1
Direction
upregulatione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“RNA-seq and qRT-PCR data revealed distinct expression patterns of SlSET genes under salt stress, with several genes showing significant upregulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing SlSET6 by VIGS reduced tomato tolerance to salt stress.

Treatment
SlSET6 silencing using VIGSe0
Gene
SlSET6e0
Outcome
tolerance to salt stresse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SlSET6 silencing using VIGS reduced tomato’s tolerance to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SlSET6 silencing led to higher lipid peroxidation under salt stress.

Treatment
SlSET6 silencing using VIGSe0
Gene
SlSET6e0
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SlSET6 silencing using VIGS reduced tomato’s tolerance to salt stress, leading to higher lipid peroxidation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SlSET6 silencing led to reduced antioxidant enzyme activity under salt stress.

Treatment
SlSET6 silencing using VIGSe0
Gene
SlSET6e0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SlSET6 silencing using VIGS reduced tomato’s tolerance to salt stress, leading to higher lipid peroxidation, reduced antioxidant enzyme activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SlSET6 silencing led to decreased proline content under salt stress.

Treatment
SlSET6 silencing using VIGSe0
Gene
SlSET6e0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SlSET6 silencing using VIGS reduced tomato’s tolerance to salt stress, leading to higher lipid peroxidation, reduced antioxidant enzyme activity, and decreased proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1199 · show in text ↑

loss of function · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

salinity · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

loss of function · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 3 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

loss of function · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 63 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

loss of function · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.