Paper · 2024 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Growth and Yield of Corn Varieties on Flooded Burning Peat Soils

S E A Rahayuningsih; S Zubaidah; S Kresnatita; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate effect of flooding on the growth and yield of a number of different types of corn grown in peat soil that has been burned. During the four-leaf phase, which lasts ten days, four different varieties of maize plants, namely BISI 2, BIMA 5, JH37, and NASA 29, were impacted by water. The level of the flooding was five centimeters. Starting in December 2020 and continuing until March 2021, the investigation was carried out at the experimental sites, which is part of the Department of Agricultural Cultivation, Faculty of Agriculture, Palangka Raya University. The research was conducted using a combination of three replications and a factorial randomized block design. The types of maize, specifically BISI 2, BIMA 5, JH37, and NASA 29, were flooded in their respective amounts, and a control does not show any signs of stagnation. Except for the quantity of leaves, there was no interaction between flooding and variety and it was not significant. There is a decrease in the number of leaves, stem diameter, plant dry weight, and maize kernel weight per plant when the plant is subjected to flooding stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding and variety did not significantly interact for traits other than leaf number.

Material
varietye0
Treatment
floodinge0
Outcome
interaction between flooding and varietye0
Qualifier
Except for the quantity of leavese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except for the quantity of leaves, there was no interaction between flooding and variety and it was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding decreased corn leaf number.

Treatment
flooding stresse0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is a decrease in the number of leaves, stem diameter, plant dry weight, and maize kernel weight per plant when the plant is subjected to flooding stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding decreased corn stem diameter.

Treatment
flooding stresse0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is a decrease in the number of leaves, stem diameter, plant dry weight, and maize kernel weight per plant when the plant is subjected to flooding stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding decreased corn plant dry weight.

Treatment
flooding stresse0
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is a decrease in the number of leaves, stem diameter, plant dry weight, and maize kernel weight per plant when the plant is subjected to flooding stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding decreased maize kernel weight per plant.

Treatment
flooding stresse0
Outcome
maize kernel weight per plante0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is a decrease in the number of leaves, stem diameter, plant dry weight, and maize kernel weight per plant when the plant is subjected to flooding stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

68 papers: 12 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

flooding · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 6 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.