Claim · model-written summary
Waterlogging reduced maize leaf number, leaf area and dry weight in both genotypes.
- Treatment
- Waterlogginge0
- Outcome
- leaf number, leaf area and dry weights of plantse0
- Direction
- reductione0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Waterlogging caused reduction in leaf number, leaf area and dry weights of plants in both genotypes.”
t0“maize”
Title
Jaiswal A; P Srivastava J African Journal of Agricultural Research 2015. doi:10.5897/ajar2015.9790
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation HUZM-265 was identified as waterlogging resistant.
- Observation HUZM-55 was identified as waterlogging susceptible.
- Intervention effect 50 µmol L-1 SNP alleviated waterlogging sensitivity, more in the susceptible genotype.
- Association Stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and chlorophyll declined with waterlogging duration.
- Intervention effect Root and shoot nitrogen content declined significantly with waterlogging.
- Intervention effect 500 µmol L-1 SNP tended to alleviate waterlogging damage.
- Observation HUZM-55 had greater root membrane injury under waterlogging than HUZM-265.
- Intervention effect 500 µmol L-1 SNP mitigated root membrane injury.
- Intervention effect 500 µmol L-1 SNP alleviated transpiration rate, chlorophyll and nitrogen content in both genotypes.
- Intervention effect 50 µmol L-1 SNP increased stomatal conductance in HUZM-265.
- Intervention effect 2000 µmol L-1 SNP increased stomatal conductance in HUZM-55.