Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out during the two successive winter seasons of 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 in in the El-Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Station in the Gharbeya Governorate, Egypt, to study the effect of mineral, bio nitrogen and spraying with some microelements individually or in the mixture on plant growth, yield and its components and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) as well as storability of onion ( cv. Giza 20 ). The interaction treatment between 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of each was the best treatments for enhancing plant height, number of leaves/plant, bulbing ratio, fresh weight and dry weight/plant at 90 and 120 days after transplanting (DAT), marketable yield and total yield /fed. macro and microelements in bulbs (N, P ,K, Fe, Cu and Zn) in both seasons. In this concern, this treatment produced relative increases in total yield/fed. were about 21.31 and 22.76 % over 100 % RRN only in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively as well as gave the highest gross return, net return and beneficial cost ratio. While, the interaction between cerealine biofertilzer only and Zn at 50 ppm as foliar application increased TSS and DM in bulbs and reduced the weight loss percentage in bulbs after five month from storage in both seasons. As for NUE, the interaction between 50 %RRN (45 kg N/fed.) + cerealine biofertilzer and spraying with the mixture of Fe+Cu+Zn at 50 ppm gave the highest values in both seasons.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% RRN, cerealine and micronutrient mixture improved plant height, leaf number and bulbing ratio.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of eache0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of leaves/plant, bulbing ratioe0
- Direction
- enhancinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction treatment between 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of each was the best treatments for enhancing plant height, number of leaves/plant, bulbing ratio”
t0“Onion”
e1“The interaction treatment between 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of each”
Claim · model-written summary
That treatment improved fresh and dry weight per plant at 90 and 120 DAT.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of eache1
- Outcome
- fresh weight and dry weight/plante0
- Qualifier
- 90 and 120 days after transplanting (DAT)e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fresh weight and dry weight/plant at 90 and 120 days after transplanting (DAT)”
t0“Onion”
e1“The interaction treatment between 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of each”
Claim · model-written summary
That treatment improved marketable and total yield per feddan.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of eache1
- Outcome
- marketable yield and total yield /fed.e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“marketable yield and total yield /fed.”
t0“Onion”
e1“The interaction treatment between 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of each”
Claim · model-written summary
That treatment improved bulb macro and microelements.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of eache1
- Outcome
- macro and microelements in bulbs (N, P ,K, Fe, Cu and Zn)e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“macro and microelements in bulbs (N, P ,K, Fe, Cu and Zn) in both seasons”
t0“Onion”
e1“The interaction treatment between 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of each”
Claim · model-written summary
That treatment raised total yield by about 21.31% in season one versus full RRN.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of eache1
- Outcome
- total yield /fed.e2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 21.31e0
- Comparator
- 100 % RRN onlye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“21.31 and 22.76 % over 100 % RRN only in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively”
t0“Onion”
e1“The interaction treatment between 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of each”
e2“total yield /fed.”
Claim · model-written summary
That treatment raised total yield by about 22.76% in season two versus full RRN.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of eache1
- Outcome
- total yield /fed.e2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 22.76 %e0
- Comparator
- 100 % RRN onlye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“21.31 and 22.76 % over 100 % RRN only in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively”
t0“Onion”
e1“The interaction treatment between 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of each”
e2“total yield /fed.”
Claim · model-written summary
That treatment gave the highest gross return, net return and benefit cost ratio.
- Treatment
- 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of eache1
- Outcome
- gross return, net return and beneficial cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“gave the highest gross return, net return and beneficial cost ratio”
e1“The interaction treatment between 75 % RRN with cerealine as biofertilzer and foliar spray with mixture micronutrients (Fe+Cu+Zn) at 50 ppm of each”
Claim · model-written summary
Cerealine plus Zn foliar application increased bulb TSS and DM.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- cerealine biofertilzer only and Zn at 50 ppm as foliar applicatione0
- Outcome
- TSS and DM in bulbse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the interaction between cerealine biofertilzer only and Zn at 50 ppm as foliar application increased TSS and DM in bulbs”
t0“Onion”
e1“the interaction between cerealine biofertilzer only and Zn at 50 ppm as foliar application”
Claim · model-written summary
Cerealine plus Zn foliar application reduced bulb weight loss after five months storage.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- cerealine biofertilzer only and Zn at 50 ppm as foliar applicatione1
- Outcome
- weight loss percentage in bulbse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- after five month from storagee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“reduced the weight loss percentage in bulbs after five month from storage”
t0“Onion”
e1“the interaction between cerealine biofertilzer only and Zn at 50 ppm as foliar application”
Claim · model-written summary
50% RRN with cerealine and micronutrient mixture gave the highest nitrogen use efficiency.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- 50 %RRN (45 kg N/fed.) + cerealine biofertilzer and spraying with the mixture of Fe+Cu+Zn at 50 ppme0
- Outcome
- NUEe2
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“50 %RRN (45 kg N/fed.) + cerealine biofertilzer and spraying with the mixture of Fe+Cu+Zn at 50 ppm gave the highest values in both seasons”
t0“Onion”
e2“As for NUE”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →copper atom · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →zinc atom · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
iron atom · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →micronutrient · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →application · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →application · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
70 papers more in this group
See all 74 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.